tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post3953751446601130277..comments2024-03-05T22:14:08.004+05:30Comments on EX-SERVICEMEN WELFARE: WRONG FIXATION OF PENSION OF JCOs/NCOs/ORs WEF 1.1.2006GaviniVNhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10714898741094006636noreply@blogger.comBlogger69125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-1527819305468380292017-11-07T15:04:39.422+05:302017-11-07T15:04:39.422+05:30hello sir,
my father is retired as hone capt in 19...hello sir,<br />my father is retired as hone capt in 1994.and now he died on 25th oct17.kindly confirm how much family pension my mother get.last pension is 44000rs approx<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14143208872249806325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-75661008926429432562017-11-07T15:02:10.341+05:302017-11-07T15:02:10.341+05:30sir my father is hony capt in indian army and died...sir my father is hony capt in indian army and died on 25th oct 17.he is serving 28 years in in army.kindly tell me how much family pension my mother get<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14143208872249806325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-75147631977720228392016-10-12T07:57:25.492+05:302016-10-12T07:57:25.492+05:30hello sir,
I am sankaran.I was served as ar...hello sir,<br /> I am sankaran.I was served as army man for 15.5 years.I was ranked as havildar (clerk GD).How much rupees ,i get pension Wef 01.01.2016.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15724684537604306096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-1582683171797239292016-07-13T15:06:56.028+05:302016-07-13T15:06:56.028+05:30Dear Sir,
It is to inform you that I am an ex-ser...Dear Sir,<br /><br />It is to inform you that I am an ex-serviceman and retired from Army (Sikh Light Infantry) wef 31 Dec 1997 prematurely after rendering 23 years and 05 days service and my pension was fixed as Rs. 3954/- vide PPO No. S/045395/97 (ARMY) dated 7 Oct 1997. My pension has been increased to Rs. 8937/- wef 01.01.2006 under 6th CPC vide GOI, MOD vide letter No. 17(4)/2008/D (Pen/Policy) dated 11.11.2008 and PCDA, Allahabad Circular No 397. This pension was further improved to Rs. 10157/- wef 01 Jul 2009 vide GOI, MOD letter No. PC-10(1)/2009-D (Pen/Pol) dated 08.03.2010 and PCDA Circular No. 430. Pension of pre-2006 pensioners (PBOR) was further revised vide GOI, MOD letter No. 1 (13)/2012/D (Pen/Policy) dated 17.01.2013 wef 24.09.2012 and PCDA Circular No. 501, but my pension was not revised. <br /><br /> Based on judicial pronouncements, Govt. of India, Ministry of Personnel, PG & Pensions, Department of pension & Pensioners’ Welfare vide OM No. 38/37/08-P&PW(A) dated 30th Jul 2015 decided that the pension/family pension of all pre-2006 pensioners/family pensioners may be revised in accordance with their OM No. 38/37/08-P&PW(A) dated 28.01.2013 with effect from 01.01.2006 instead of 24.09.2012. Accordingly, all pre-2006 Commissioned Officers of Armed forces were given their pension wef 01.01.2006 instead of 24.09.2012, whereas for PBOR, GOI, MOD vide letter No. 1(04)/2015(II)-D(Pen/Pol) dated 03.09.2015, has prepared separate Annexure ‘A’ for Army, Annexure ‘B’ for Air Force & Annexure ‘C’ for Navy, authorising disbursing authority to step up pension/family pension wef 01.01.2006 instead of allowing of pension tables as given in GOI, MOD letter dated 17 Jan 2013. My pension as given in this annexure is Rs. 8010/- whereas my initial pension as on 01.01.2006 was fixed as 8937/-. Hence, no arrear has been paid to me and I have been allowed to continue to draw my pension as Rs. 10157/- wef 01 Jul 2009. As per judicial pronouncements, my pension which I was drawing wef 01 Jul 2009 should be paid to me wef 01.01.2006. This seems to be totally injustice to me.<br /><br /> In case of officers, order issued vide GOI, MOD letter No. 1(04)/2015(I)-D (Pen/Pol) dated 3rd Sep 2015, (para 4) states that revised tables indicating minimum guaranteed pension/ordinary family pension for Indian Commissioned Officers which is annexed with GOI, MOD letter No. 1 (11)/2012-D(Pen/Policy dated 17.01.2013 shall be effective with effect 01.01.2006 instead of 24.09.2012. Why this same formula is not applied to PBOR.<br /><br /> On delinking of 33 years qualifying service, I am entitled for Rs. 11970/- pm wef 01 Jan 2006 to 30 Jun 2014 and Rs. 12268/- per month, but this all is under cloud, no hope for better future. When MOD will issue suitable order for PBOR on delinking of 33 years qualifying service for full pension benefits.<br /><br /> To deliver natural justice to me, May I request you to kindly look into this and take up this issue with GOI, MOD to remove this anomaly. <br /><br />I shall be remained grateful to you.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04884260311720583390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-79768468172912141302016-06-05T16:33:01.750+05:302016-06-05T16:33:01.750+05:30Respected Brig Saheb, as per your statement above ...Respected Brig Saheb, as per your statement above Nb Sub are not at loss and they are getting 50% as per circular 430. Due to 33 years service rule as a Nb sub 21'5 years service,I was getting 8573/- Now on delinking of 33 years rule, am I eligible for Rs 10765/- as basic.? Kindly clarify pleaseAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06842045246492535609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-90350029128137538862016-05-18T20:15:11.155+05:302016-05-18T20:15:11.155+05:30Dear sir, Delinking of 33 years to full pension. P... <br />Dear sir, Delinking of 33 years to full pension. PLease refer PCDA circular No 502 dated 17 Jan 2013. This circular was issued for Enhanced/ ordinary rate of family pension. Table in this circular for Enhanced rate of family pension in Table 1 & ordinary rate of family pension in Table No 2. Enhanced rate of family pension is equal to service pension. In PCDA circular 501 dated 17 Jan 2013 table DESW/ PCDA have shown pension based on 50% of Notional max pay as per fitment table among three services with prorate reduction for less service. But Min pension i.e, 50% of min pay in pay band as per fitment table is not maintained. In circular 502 dated 17 Jan 2013 which was issued for Enhanced/ ordinary rate of family pension, same pensions i.e 50% of notional max pay as per fitment table as shown as in circular No 501 dated 17 Jan 2013 and 50%/30% of min pay as per fitment table is also maintained. There is no confusion in Min pension. Unnecessary DESW is prolonging/ delaying the issue. Simply they have to reissue Tables of DESW/ PCDA circular No 502 dated 17 Jan 2013 Table 1 Enhanced rate of family pension for Service pension and Table 2 Ordinary rate of family pension for family pension. If I am wrong, Please advice me. Twice I have represented these thins to DESW and PCDA. But reply is not satisfactory. Regards ....Prakash Pattar. Ex Sub Maj.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249523171649503574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-59475718030254078652016-05-09T14:31:33.177+05:302016-05-09T14:31:33.177+05:30R/ Sir ,
anyone can provide me Rank list ...R/ Sir , <br /> anyone can provide me Rank list for pre 01.01.2006 retired personal.On behalf LPC cum DATA sheet filled up and PCDA fixed pension. If anyone of you can provide it please contact me bass.sunil07@gmail.com<br />Thank you<br />Sunil Basshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05860341388677730890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-21623464532609019982016-04-19T15:28:54.669+05:302016-04-19T15:28:54.669+05:30As per table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 Febr...As per table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 February 2016 basic pension of Honorary Naib Subedar & Naib Subedar of X group for service 24 years or 26 years has fixed in same rate i.e. Rs 11138 but basic pension of Honorary Naib Subedar & Naib Subedar of Y group is different. This difference is Rs 1004/- .<br />As per table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 February 2016 for 24 years service Y group Honorary Naib Subedar basic pension has fixed at Rs 8425/- and Naib Subedar basic pension has fixed on Rs 9429/- which is not understood in OROP and it is injustice with the Honorary Naib Subedar of Y group.<br />Hony Rank of Naib Subedar granted to Havildar will be notionally considered as a promotion to the higher grade pay and will be allowed notionally for the purposes of fixation of pension only with effect from 01-1-2006. The said decision has been communicated vide Ministry of Defence letter NO. 1(8)/2008-D (Pen/ Policy) dated 12-6-2009.<br />As per table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 February 2016 24 years service of X group Naib Subedar & Honorary Naib Subedar pension are equal, so 24 years service of Y group Naib Subedar & Honorary Naib Subedar pension also should be equal, please consider it.<br />Keeping view of the above, You are requested to do the needful.<br />Thanking you with warm regards,<br />Yours obediently soldier,<br />2879637W Honorary Naib Subedar Vijai Kumar, PPO No-S/29763/2006(ARMY)vijai kumar dudihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12339778500933957303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-82324632719105074052016-03-03T08:43:42.960+05:302016-03-03T08:43:42.960+05:30Respected Sir, I am No 14223942H Ex Naik (TS) Nare...Respected Sir, I am No 14223942H Ex Naik (TS) Narendra Bahadur Misra retired from Army Corps of Signals from the Matric Entry Trade with Science Group (OCC Class -I) after completing 15 years of service. As per your norms in the Army Matric Entry Trades are considered in X group. As on date I was received OROP but the pension was consider in Y Group. I request you sir kindly consider my pension in X group. Thanking you sir Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-32979824343231400242016-02-10T21:45:11.705+05:302016-02-10T21:45:11.705+05:301. I have understood that nothing is going to be c...1. I have understood that nothing is going to be changed unless there is an intervention by the developed nations. <br /><br />2. The country is still following the colonial mindset and some country might have vested interests that we continue to do so. Unless they think for us we are not going to be benefited by any means. That is what I think so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-65012965949128099902016-02-10T13:15:38.799+05:302016-02-10T13:15:38.799+05:30Atleast my future generations will not join in the...Atleast my future generations will not join in the defence forces as pbors. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-9475939937840370622016-02-06T23:07:09.296+05:302016-02-06T23:07:09.296+05:30I am going to get any benefit from this OROP imple...I am going to get any benefit from this OROP implementation. The chart shows less pension basic than what I am drawing. How is that possible? If they take average pension, then also I am supposed to get an increased amount of basic because of the increment in every year. The chart is either wrongly calculated or a malafide intention. Jai ho! <br />But don't worry. I will carry on writing on this, so that everyone of this world come to know the truth. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-18679721442891344882016-01-21T17:02:43.484+05:302016-01-21T17:02:43.484+05:30During pre-independence British era, we had the wh...During pre-independence British era, we had the whites and the Indians and now we have the officers and the men in the Armed Forces. We got the freedom but the powers only transferred from the white hands to the brown hands and the laws remain the same. British used to take care of their officer’s welfare selfishly and resorted to various disciplinary policies of the subordinate ranks only. I hope, we are not abiding by the same mentality even after 67th years of independence also. We are a completely independent country now. We must feel proud to be an Indian. Why to follow age old Act and rules? Can’t we move forward with our own sets of rules? Aristocratic rules have no place in the armed forces atmosphere. Suppression and oppression also have no place in a democratic country. Equality, opportunity and respect for each and every citizens of this country can only make us a strong global power. What is the purpose of purchasing those costly flying machines or weapons if the soldiers who will operate or maintain those have low morale, sense of prejudice or a sense of neglect? The good politicians and the bureaucrats must step in at the earliest, for the sake of the country’s prosperity, safety and the security. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-18072238662031993882016-01-13T20:26:22.453+05:302016-01-13T20:26:22.453+05:30Look at the discrimination meted out in terms of P...Look at the discrimination meted out in terms of Pay and status to the Group X Technical Airmen of the Indian Air Force:-<br /><br />For all the three armed forces, i.e., Army, Navy and the Indian Air Force, for the group X technical trades, the entry level qualification is 10+2 in science or diploma in engineering. After their training they become equivalent to Diploma in Engineering. In Army and Navy those diploma qualified personnel are placed directly as JCO and Petty officer respectively, but in the Indian Air Force, those diploma qualified personnel are placed as Aircraftsman (equivalent to Sepoy) and thus placed in the lowest pay band, i.e. pay band 1. How funny it is. Isn’t it?<br /><br />Further, a diploma qualified person is supposed to get the salary of a BE in 10 to 12 years as per the government policy but, forget about pay band 3, the Group X technical airmen even after becoming a Sergeant also, can not reach to Pay band 2 (which they are supposed to get after their training). They bear the financial losses silently and remain restricted to the lowest pay band. They can reach to pay band 2 if they give an extension of service after completing their initial bonds and become a Junior Warrant Officer (May be after 24 to 26 years of service). That is the one and only pay band given to them in their entire career on promotion. They may be promoted to the highest rank of an airman but have to satisfy them to be in pay band 2 for ever. Please tell me, which technical airman will like to extend his service, after completing his initial bond? <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-74867133486816836232016-01-12T20:39:20.055+05:302016-01-12T20:39:20.055+05:30Hav Y gp 18 years of service should get basic pens...Hav Y gp 18 years of service should get basic pension 5992 as per PCDA circular No 502 dated 17th January 2013.Prakash Pattarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-55948760704456800912016-01-12T20:35:11.183+05:302016-01-12T20:35:11.183+05:30The reply give by Jayarajan AK is not correct. Ple...The reply give by Jayarajan AK is not correct. Please refer PCDA circular No 502 dated 17th January 2013. The min pension of Hav is 5820 and Max 7650.Prakash Pattarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-11833834203832824192016-01-12T20:17:28.677+05:302016-01-12T20:17:28.677+05:30Sir, In case of Hony Lt / Hony Capt pre-revised sc...Sir, In case of Hony Lt / Hony Capt pre-revised scale was 10500 for Hony Lt and 10850 for Hony Capt. Their Min / Max of the fitment table remains same. That is 10500 x 1.86 = 19530 + 5400 + 6000 = 30930 its 50% = 15465. And Hony Capt 10850 x 1.86 = 20190 + 6100 + 6000 = 32290 its 50% = 16145. You can please refer to PCDA Circular No 502 dated 17th January 2013. Prakash Pattarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-3388122852198238432016-01-12T20:01:48.687+05:302016-01-12T20:01:48.687+05:30For Hony Lt Minimum and maximum of the fitment tab...For Hony Lt Minimum and maximum of the fitment table is same. That is 10500 x 1.86 = 19530 + 5400 gde pay + 6000 MSP = 30930 its 50% = 15465. But PCDA circular is showing this figure for 28 years and above service and reduced proportionately for less service. This is not correct. The 15465 basic pension should be for all Hony Lts irreapective of length of service. The correct table you can find in PCDA circular No 502 in which Enhanced rate of family pension and ordinary rate of family pension have been shown. Prakash Pattarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-6617602545828845612016-01-12T19:51:40.929+05:302016-01-12T19:51:40.929+05:30The table attached with pcda circular No 547 is wr...The table attached with pcda circular No 547 is wrong. Correct table is attached with PCDA circular No 502 dated 17th January 2013 in which enhanced rate of family pension / ordinary rate of family pension have been worked out min 50% and 30% of minimum of fitment table for least service and maximum service 50% / 30% of maximum of the fitment table. But deduction per every half year of service is not correct. Deduction for every half year of service should be half of increment. For example increment in 5th CPC was 200 for Sub Majs. Then 200 x 1.86 = 372 its 50% 186 should have been reduced every year. For half year 50% of 186 = 92 should have been reduced for every half year. But every half year Rs 205 has been reduced. Like that in each rank same type of anomaly is there. What is the base for for deduction is not known to me. We all should write and approach to DESW MOD and PCDA for correcting the table as per their circular No 502 dated 17th January 2013 wef 01.01.2006. Please wake up every body and take action. I have already written to PCDA and DESW MOD in writing as well as online greivance registration with DOPPW GOI. Prakash Pattarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-27605083589110574862016-01-10T13:50:08.539+05:302016-01-10T13:50:08.539+05:30Just wait. The good politicians are now aware of t...Just wait. The good politicians are now aware of the facts. The PBORs may get a good deal in the near future.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-65135171725383899562016-01-08T21:58:09.008+05:302016-01-08T21:58:09.008+05:30My benefits of joining in the Indian Air Force:-
(...My benefits of joining in the Indian Air Force:-<br />(a) Although a diploma qualified person but was called a Fitter in the service and after the retirement also the same endorsement by the district soldier's board.<br />(b) I was an OR in the service and still an OR after my retirement also. This discrimination I feel whenever I visit any CSD canteen or an ECHS polyclinic.<br />(c) Being a diploma qualified person worked in the lowest pay band throughout my career i.e starting from joining to leaving the service (initial bond).<br />(d) Whether OROP or pay commission, my pension increase will be very less. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-27061320590921721452016-01-08T21:25:06.783+05:302016-01-08T21:25:06.783+05:30Immaturity of my age and the attractive advertisem...Immaturity of my age and the attractive advertisement drew my attention to join in the Air Force as a Group X technical airmen. After two years initial training, I became a diploma qualified technical person but remain restricted to the lowest pay band, starting from joining to leaving the service after completing my initial bond. Isn't it a mockery that a diploma qualified person is called a Fitter in the service? Another funny thing is, in service I was an OR and after the retirement also I feel the same discrimination, whenever I visit either a CSD canteen or an ECHS polyclinic and throughout my life, I will be addressed as OR only whenever I will visit those places. It was my fault to join in Air Force and now other than cursing me I can't do anything to calm me. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-24711696037488410992015-12-21T13:49:21.777+05:302015-12-21T13:49:21.777+05:30I never understood why every pay commission has de...I never understood why every pay commission has degraded the status and pay of the Technical Sgts in the Indian Air Force:- <br /> Technical Airmen in the Indian Air Force are either a civil diploma holder or 10+2 in Science and <br />thereafter undergo technical training in their respective training institutes. Although the qualification they <br />achieve after completion of their training is equivalent to a civil diploma engineer, but the reason is unknown why the technical Airmen (equivalent to civil diploma engineers) are placed in the lowest pay band (5200-20200) with a ‘X’ group pay of 1400 rupees only, after completion of their training. Whereas the civil diploma holders are directly placed in Pay band – 2 with a Grade pay of 4200/- rupees. This is totally injustice with the technical airmen. <br /> Further, a civil diploma engineer becomes equivalent to a Degree in Engineering and gets promoted, at least, to the position of an Assistant Engineer, or an Engineer in 10 to 12 years. The salary also increases considerably. But for a technical airman, even to get a diploma engineer’s scale, he has to complete a minimum of 13& ½ years of service, clears all the requisite service promotion exams and become a SGT (Senior non commissioned officer). Yes, this the rank, from when, a technical airman <br />becomes eligible to get a diploma engineer’s scale. You may laugh, but, wait. There are more things need to be said. Does he get the actual diploma engineer’s scale then also? Let me compare and the picture will be cleared to all of you.<br />Pay of civil diploma holder in 5th Pay Commission: 5000-150- 8000 / Pay of technical SGT in 5th Pay <br />Commission: 4670-85- 5945. Later upgraded to 5000-100- 6500 (The reason? to give less pension?)<br />Pay of civil diploma holder in 6th Pay Commission: 9300-34800 with a grade pay 4200/ Pay of technical SGT in 6th Pay Commission (fact but true) :- 5200- 20200 with a Grade pay of Rs. 2800. <br /> Why this sort of discrimination and injustice? There can’t be any argument that higher ranks <br />deserve higher pays. But does that mean the subordinate staffs need to be paid less? Moreover, what does the ‘Military Service Pay’ means? The JCOs & the other ranks placed below the Commissioned officers are less military than the military nursing staffs? Are they combatant? Why a non combatant staff will get more MSP than a combatant personnel? Will the commissioned officers allow this type of injustice with themselves? The JCOs(Class II Gazetted Offr) and the other ranks are also central government employees. They can’t form an union. Even some of their fundamental rights are restricted. Please think for them also. They also need to be looked after. Is there anyone who is listening? The world is watching at us!<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-36125417785155321542015-12-08T21:10:56.325+05:302015-12-08T21:10:56.325+05:30Dear sir, all the group IV trades of IAF of pre86,...Dear sir, all the group IV trades of IAF of pre86,pre96,pre10/10/97 & group Z of post 10/10/97 till 31/12/2005 are placed in group Z & the pensions from the beginning for you has been fixed correctly.Table 115 of Circular 430 itself clrears the whole of the doubts. But the most pathetic thing is that all the group IV trades including MTD of Army till 31/12/2005 are placed in group Y, while the same of IAF are placed in group Z. It shows the policy makers either knowingly have done the great injustice towards the said group of IAF or might be with their inadequate knowledge towards the same.DNPatnaikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02829017845873474929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8660791779547883173.post-11679265748515448372015-12-01T14:42:11.068+05:302015-12-01T14:42:11.068+05:301.I am pre 2006 PBOR. I was discharged from Air ...1.I am pre 2006 PBOR. I was discharged from Air Force on 31.05.1992 after completing 15 years of service in Group IV Trade. My basic pension on the date of discharge was Rs.479/- as per PPO No. 08/14/B/06606/1992. My pension was revised and improved on many occasions which are as follows:<br /> <br />1. Pension on discharge 01.06.1992Rs. 479.00<br />2. Pension on 01.01.1996 V CPCRs.1480.00<br />3. Pension on 01.01.2004 (DP Merger)Rs.2220.00<br />4. Improvement pension (with DP) 01.01.2006Rs.2411.00<br />(Group of Ministers)<br />5. Revised pension as on 01.01.2006 VI CPCRs.3633.00<br />6. Improvement pension 01.07.2009 (CSC)Rs.4515.00<br />7. Improvement pension 24.09.2012Rs.4949.00<br /> <br />2.On 10th October 1997 the pay structure was revised based on educational qualification and in which Group IV was merged with Group III and subsequently existing Group II and II were placed in "Y" group. The pay structure of Group III and Group IV were the same prior to 10.10.1997 or as on 09.10.1997 (i.e. 3775 - 85 - 5050)<br /> <br />3.As such pension for Group IV and Group III sergeants having 15 years of service and the same as on 01.01.2006 i.e. Rs.3633/-. Whereas on 01.07.2009 CSC has bridged the group of Pre 2006 and Post 2006 PBOR pensioners. In which pre 10.10.1997 PBOR pensioners were brought at par with post 10.10.1997 PBOR pensioners. Also refer SAF 01/05/2008 as PCDC Circular 471.<br /> <br />4.Since pre 10.10.1997 PBOR pensioners, were brought at par with post 10.10.1997 PBOR pensioners, my pension as on 01.07.2009 is to be fixed at Rs.4840/- (For Group III sergeant having 15 years of service as per Table 114 of PCDS Circular 430). But my pension was fixed at Rs.4515/- (Table 115 of PCDA Circular 430 which is for Group V, converted to Group IV and Group "Z")<br /> <br /> <br />5.In Case of PBOR who were invalidated out during 01.01.1986 to 31.12.1995 the pay drawn at the time of invalidment must shall be adopted for national fixation of the pay as on 01.01.1996 and it is further fixation as on 10.10.1997 at the rate given to similar PBOR of the same rank and group after the revision of pay scale wef 01.01.1996and 10.10.1997. I would like to state with heavy heart that government and the concerned issue circulars for the benefit of pensioners but these who implement the instruction and circulars were reluctant or ill conceived the same and the benefits were not reached to pensioners.<br /> <br />6.Further my pension was revised on 24.09.2012 as Rs.4949/- as PCDA Circular 501 Table No.17. As on 01.07.2009 my pension was fixed wrongly and the same is resulted in wrong fixation as on 24.09.2012. My pension as on 24.09.2012 is to be fixed as Rs.5301/- as per Table 17 of PCDA Circular 501. Para 5.2 of the PCDA Circular 501 state that pension payable from 01.07.2009 may be paid correctly first as per instruction contained in PCDA Circular 430 and thereafter pension to be revised as on 24.09.2012 as per PCDA Circular 501.<br /> <br />7.In view of above, I request you sir kindly verify the pension fixation as on 01.07.2009 and 24.12.2012 for 15 years qualifying service of a Sergeant of Group IV which merged to Group III on 10.10.1997. The CPPC Chennai fixed me wrongly using the wrong Table which can be verified and corrected only at CDA (AF) New Delhi.thomas chhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05324502687619746131noreply@blogger.com