| Item |
HEARD BY |
PETITION NO. &
YEAR |
LEAD PETITIONER |
NEXT DATE FIXED FOR
HEARING |
REMARKS IN BRIEF |
| 1 |
CAT-PB Delhi |
OA 1165 / 2011 |
Pratap Narain & Ors Vs. MOP/DOP |
23.05.14 |
SCPC Recommendations in respect of pensioners, who
retired prior to 1.1.2006, was accepted and approved by the Union Cabinet, vide
MOP(DOP&PW) Resolution dated 29.08.2008 but while implementing, revised pension was wrongly reduced even where qqualifying
service was more than 20 years.
This petition prays for refixation of pension at full
rate where qualifying service
happens to be more than 20 years, exactly as per
Resolution dated 29.08.2008.UOI filed an affidavit on 15.04.14. A Counter to this would be filed
soon.
|
| 2 |
CAT-PB Delhi |
OA 2165 / 2011 |
KR Srinivasan & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP |
23.05.14 |
Same as for item 1 above. |
| 3 |
CAT-PB Delhi |
OA 247 of 2012 |
17 Petitioners |
23.05.14 |
Same as for item 1 above. |
| 4 |
Lucknow HC |
Ser.Ben.203 / 2010 |
s29 UP Officers |
Second week of May'14 |
The case is for modified parity i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of
minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre
revised pay scale from which a pensioner had retired,
in terms of Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. Heard on 16.4.14 but
UOI Advocate sought time, which
was granted.
|
| 5 |
Delhi HC |
WP(C)3359/ 2010 |
Ex.Para Military (s29,s26) Association Vs UOI |
14.08.14 |
The case is for modified parity i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of
minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre
revised pay scale from which a pension had retired, in
terms of Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. Bench did not assemble
on 6.3.14.
|
| 6 |
Supreme Court |
Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009 |
SPS Vains, Major General & Ors. |
30.06.14 |
This case is for grant of Modified Parity in terms of MOP,DOP Resolution
dated 29.8.2008, after including the same in Special Instructions. |
| 7 |
Supreme Court |
Civil Appeal 2966 / 2011 |
U0I Vs SPS Vains Mj. General & Ors |
30.06.14 |
This case is for grant of Modified Parity in terms of MOP,DOP Resolution
dated 29.8.2008, after including the same in Special Instructions. |
| 8 |
Supreme Court |
Civil Appeal 8875-8876 of 2011. |
U0I & Ors.Vs. Vinod Kumar Jain & Ors (Avtar Singh) |
24.07.14 |
CA No. 8875-76 and SLP(C)CC No.18339 -341 of 2013 are now Converted to SLP (Civil) 36148-36150 /
2013. |
| 9 |
Supreme Court |
Civil Appeal 5367 -5368 / 2005 SLPC CC 5081-82/2004 |
Principal Secretary, Govt. Finance and Planning Deptt., Andhra Pradesh Vs.
A.P. Pensioners Samaj. |
30.04.14 |
Heard on 30.04.2014 and dismissed with following
remarks : "We do not see any reason to interfere with the concurrent conclusion
of the High Court as well as of the Tribunal. The appeals are accordingly
dismissed." |
| 10 |
Delhi HC |
WPC No. 4572 of 2012 |
All India S30 Pensioners Association Vs. UOI |
DOJ 19.8.13. |
|
| 11 |
CAT-PB/Delhi |
Contempt Petition No.158 of 2012 |
CG SAG (S29) Pensioners Association, Shri Satish Verma, Rtd.CE Vs. Shri RC
Mishra, Sec. DOP, MOP,GOI. and Shri Sumit Bose, Sec.DOE,MOF, GOI. |
15.05.14 |
This Petition is against
non-compliance of orders passed by CAT-PB while giving Judgment in case of OA
0655/2010 with other OAs. In view of IR granted by Delhi HC on 21.5.12, hon.ble
Court on 30.5.12 closed the case with liberty to move application for revival of
CP as per the Orders of hon.ble Delhi HC. Accordingly, after the dismisal of UOI
Petition in Delhi HC, the revival application was put
up which was heard on 24.5.13 and 28.5.13 and orders
for isuue of notices to respondents were passed. Hearing on 7.8.13 couldnot take
place. Case was heard on 25.9.13. Hon.ble Court ordered for revival of Contempt
Petition and fixed 10.10.13 to take up contempt
proceedings. On 10.10.13, during hearing ASG himself appeared for UOI and argued
citing pending SLPs in Supreme Court, for stay on contempt proceedings
which was opposed by the Advocate of Association.
Court did not agree for granting stay but fixed next date of hearing as 27.11.13. Adjouraned due to
non-availability of one of the Judges to 18.12.13, 15.01.14 and 12.02.14. Heard
but adjourned for 19.02.14. UOI submitted MA for certain clarification from Court and Court adjourned the
hearing till 15.05.2014. In the meanwhile, the Curative
Petition submitted to HSC by UOI has also been
dismissed on 30.04.14, attaining full and comlete finality to the case, leaving
no scope for any clarification or change in Judgment
of CAT-PB, already merged with the judgment of the HSC, except for
implementation of the "direction" or facing contempt proceedings. |
| 12 |
Supreme Court |
SLP (Civil) 19784 of 2013 with SLP(C)CC 12122,12366,1 2373,13325 &
14816. |
Haryana Viduat Prasaran Nigam Ltd & Ors Vs R K Agarwal and Ors |
DOJ 28.10.13 |
This SLP is againsst Punjab and Haryana High
Court Judgment in case of CWP No. 19641 of 2009 R K Agarwal &Ors. Vs. HVPN
Ltd & Ors. dated 21.12.2012. Hearing took place wheein Haryana Advocate
pleaded about Haryana Regulations for Pensioners and about financial
implications which Respondents Advocate opposed. Court was not impressed but
allowed them to put up their arguments in writing for orders before
next hearing which was fixed
for 28.10.2013 when following orders were passed : Learned counsel appearing for
the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the special leave petitions with liberty to approach
the High Court. Permission is granted. Consequently, the special leave petitions
are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. |
| 13 |
Supreme Court |
SLP (C) 23055 of 2013 |
UOI & Ors Vs CGSAGs29 Pensioners Assoc.& Ors. |
DOJ 29.07.13 |
UOI has filed this SLP against the Delhi High Court Judgment dated 29.4.13
in case of WP(C) 1535 of 2012. This case was heard by Hon.ble Supreme Court on
29.07.2013 with SLP(C) CC No.13280 of 2013, UOI Vs Atma Singh (arising out of
P&H HC Judgment) and issued following Orders of Dismissal : "We are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by
the High Court. Consequently, the special leave petitions are dismissed.
However, the petitioners are at liberty to raise all points before the Tribunal
as and when the appeal, including the contempt
petition is preferred." |
| 14 |
CAT-PB |
OA No. 937 of 2010 and OA No. 2101 of 2010 (DHC
order for Fresh Adjudication) |
All India S30 Pensioners Association Vs. UOI |
|
Hon.ble Delhi High Court, in WP(C) 4572 of 2012 in case of All India S30
Pensioners Association Vs. UOI has, by order dated 19.8.2013, has restored these
two OAs for fresh adjudication on merits on the claim of full parity, giving
full opportunity of hearing the petitioners, without binding decision given on
1.11.2011 in case of OA No. 655 of 2010. Delhi HC has furtehr ordered that the
matter would be decided in remand preferably within three months from 19.8.2013
and case be listed for hearing by on 9.9.2013, when both parties would appear
before Registrar of CAT-PB.Not heard on 25.9.13. |
| 15 |
Supreme Court |
Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 328 of 2013 |
N.K. Nair & Anr. Vs Shashikant Sharma & Ors. |
No further listing. |
While implementing 4th CPC Report pay of Army ,
Navy and AF Officers upto Brigadier level and equivalent, was fixed without
adding Rank Pay. Hon.le Supreme Couart vide Judgment dated 4.9.12 had directed
for refixation of their pay after adding the Rank Pay and arrears paid
accordingly. MOD issued orders on 27.12.12 for implementation of the said
Judgment. CP(C) 328 of 2013 has been preferred in Supreme Court with plea that
(1) Judgment should be implemented w.e.f. 1.1.1986 and not as on 1.1.1986,(2)
Minimum of Pay in Integrated Pay Scale for each Rank of officers given in SAI
1/S/87 for Amy and equivaalent officers in Navy and AF should also be raised,(3)
Maximum of Integratred Pay scale i.e. 5,100 should also be raised and (4)
Refixation of revised pay on 1.1.1996 (5th CPC) and
1.1.2006 (6th CPC) should be done again on the basis of law set by the above
mentioned Judgment of the Apex Court, now, meaning thereby, that, the
revised pay should be refixed by adding into existing
pay the admissible component of Rank Pay or MSP, as the case may be and,payment
of arrears be made,accordingly. Further, it is learnt that the Attorney General
for India, when Govt. sought his advice, has advised, after due consideration of
the pleas in the light of Apex Court Judgment to agree to plea (1) and (4) and
not to agree for (2) and (3). Heard on 15.11.13 and notices issued to alleged
contemptners to appear in person on next date of
hearing.On 17.2.14 Court heard the case, none of the Respondents appeared but
their Advocate, SG, sought time for submitting Counter Court allowed two weeks
time.On 10.03.14 Advocate on record for petitioners sought time for submitting
Rejoinder Affidavit and Court allowed two weeks time.
On 31.03.14 HSC heard and passed following orders : In light of the rival
submission as above, let an application be made by the petitioners for
impleadment of the present Defence Secretary and Controller General of Defence
Accounts. The application may be listed for consideration as and when
made. |
| 16 |
Supreme Court |
SLP(C)CC No.18339 -341 of 2013. The Case is
Converted to SLP (Civil) 36148-36150 / 2013
connected to CA No. 8875/2011 |
UOI Vs DL Vhora & Ors. |
24.07.14 |
These SLPs (along with applications for condoning delay) have been filed by
UOI against Delhi HC Judgment dated 29.04.13 in WPC No. 2348-50/2012. (Full
parity case).The case came up for hearing before HSC Bench comparising CJI and
Justice Ranjan Gogai on 04.10.13 whereupon hon.ble Court ordered : List on
07.10.13 before an approprite Bench. On 07.10.13 the case came up for hearing
before HSC Bench comparising of Justice Nijjar and Justice Kalifulla. The Court
ordered "On the request of Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, learned ASG, list these matters
along with Civil Appeal Nos.8875-8876 of 2011." Case adjourned for hearing on
01.11.13. Heard on 1.11.13 and delinked from CA No. 8875-76.Heaard on 19.11.13
and again linked to CA No. 8875-76, delaly condoned, ordered for issuing notices
and staying bringing up contempt petition in HC or CAT.Not herd on
4.2.14. |
| 17 |
Supreme Court |
SLP(C) 19784 SLP (C) CC 12122, 12366, 12373, 13325,
14816, all of 2013. |
H V P N L Vs. R K Agarwal and Other 5 Respondents |
DOJ 28.10.13 |
These SLPs (along with applications for condoning the delay) are against
P&H High Court Judgments granting Modified Parity to Haryana State Govt.
Pensioners.Heard on 18.10.13. Hon.ble Court asked UOI Advocate to submit written
statement before next hearing. Case was heard on 28.10.13 and following order
were passed : Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the special leave petitions with
liberty to approach the High Court. Permission is granted. Consequently, the
special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as
aforesaid. |
| 18 |
Supreme Court |
Review Petition(Civil) No. 2492 of 2013. 31861 of 2013 |
UOI Ors. Vs s29 SAG Pensioners Association |
DOJ 12.11.13 |
This Review Petition(Civil) has been filed on 4.10.13 and is under scrutiny.
This is against Judgment of dismissal given by hon.ble Supreme Court in case of
UOI Vs. s29 Pen. Assoc. SLP(C) No. 23055 on 23.07.13.The RP was taken up in
Chamber by the hon.ble Supreme Court and following order were passed on 12.11.13
: "Delay condoned. Prayer for oral hearing is
rejected. We have perused the Review Petition as well as the grounds in support
of the Review Petition. In our opinion, no case for review of order, dated 29th
July, 2013, is made out. Consequently, the review petition is
dismissed." |
| 19 |
Supreme Court |
SLP(C) 33864 of 2013 |
U.O.I,SECRET ARY,MIN OF COMMUNICAT ION&ORS Vs RAM KISHAN PANIPAT |
DOJ 28.10.13 |
Heard on 28.10.13. Hon.ble Supreme Court passed
following order : We are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the
High Court.Consequently,the special leave petition is dismissed. However, the
petitioners are at liberty to raise all points before the Tribunal as and when
the appeal, including the contempt petition is preferred. |
| 20 |
CAT / Chandigarh |
Con.Pet. No.84 / 2013 |
Atma Singh Vs U.O.I., Secret.,DOP and Secret. Comunication |
Next date of hearing is not yet known. |
Modified parity case. CAT/Chandigarh in OA No. 44/HR/2012 gave judgment
directing UOI to fix revised pension in terms Resolution dated 29.8.2008in but
UOI preferred CWP 22510/2012 in P&H HC but the same was disallowed. UOI then
preferred SLP(C) CC 13280 / 2013, which hon.ble Supreme Court dismissed on
29.7.2013, alongwith SLPC 23055, which was against CGSAGs29p Association.
Contempt Petition No. 84/2013 has been filed now against UOI, Sec. /DOP and Sec.
/ Coomunicastion. for their failure in implementing CAT/Ch. directions, even
when Review Petition has also been dismissed. |
| 21 |
P & H High Court |
EA 35 /2013 in CWP 3452/2010 |
O P Kapur &Ors Vs State of Haryana & Ors |
14.03.14 |
In CWP 3452 P&H HC on 21.12.2012 had directed Haryana Govt. to refix
pension giving modifed parity and pay arrears thereto within two months or pay
arrears with 9 % interest after 1.3.2013. Haryana Govt. preferred SLPC
19784/2013 which was dismissed as withdrawn by the hon.ble Supreme Court on
28.10.2013.Haryana Govt. then filed a Reviw Application in P&H HC to review
the Order dated 21.12.2012 despite the affirming order by the hon.ble Supreme
Court, which was dismissed on 31.01.2013. During the hearing of EA 35/2013 on
26.02.2014 the P&H HC has passed following orders : "It is made clear that
in case necessary steps are not initiated and amount is not disbursed to the
applicants/petitioners before the next date of hearing, this Court may be
constrained to call the official respondents in Court or order may be passed to
attach salaries of the Officers concerned." During
hearing on 14.03.2014 Govt. Advocate informed the Court that the PPOs of
Petitioners have been revised and orders for payment of arrears of revised
pension w.e.f. 1.1.2006, along with 9 % interest thereon, have been
issued. |
| 22 |
Supreme Court |
Curative Petition No. 126 of 2014 |
UOI Vs CGSAGs29 Pensioners Association |
30.04.14 |
This Curative Petition was against dismissal of
Review Petition No. 2492 of 2013. The five Judgme Bench of hon.ble Supreme Court
presided over by the hon.ble CJI himself, dismissed this petition on 30.04.2014
stating that no case was made out within the parameters indicated in the
decision of this Court in case of Rupa Ashok Hurra and Ashok Hurra reported in
2002(4)SCC
388. |
The cases are not updated
ReplyDelete