Thursday, March 26, 2015

CONTROLLER GENERAL OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS - CENTRALISED PENSION DISBURSEMENT SYSTEM CONCEPT PAPER

  Ministry of Defence disburses appx Rs. 51,000 crore every year as
pension benefits to 24.16 lakh defence pensioners – both service personnel as well as defence civilians. While pension sanction is being done in a centralised way – by PCDA (Pension) Allahabad in r/o Army and defence civilians; by PCDA (Navy) in r/o Navy personnel and by JCDA (AF) Subroto Park, New Delhi in r/o Air Force personnel, pension disbursement is being carried out by a number of agencies who are working as PDAs (Pension Disbursing Agencies) – 28 Public Sector and 4 Pvt Sector Banks, 63 DPDOs, State Treasuries and Post Offices. Banks have the largest number of pensioners on their roll – appx 18.06 lakh pensioners or 75% of the total number of defence pensioners. And they disburse Rs. 3800 crores every month (or Rs. 45,600 crores per annum which is almost 90% of the total pension disbursement to defence pensioners) as pension to these pensioners. Instances have come to notice where different practices have been followed by banks or where different interpretation have been arrived at and implemented for one government order, resulting in complaints from pensioners. An analysis of grievances received at the Ministry or at CGDA office or at PCDA (Pension) office reveal that more than 95% of the complaints pertain to pensioners drawing their pension from the banks. The task of addressing these grievances and providing services to pensioners to their complete satisfaction is an arduous one. This, however, could be changed by adopting a new paradigm for pension disbursement.

2. This new paradigm is centralised disbursement of pension. This simply means disbursing pension from a central agency viz. Centralised Pension Disbursement Agency (CPDA) to all the pensioners. The Existing Pension Disbursement System

PDA - (CPPC) - Bank A/c
PDA  - (DPDO) -  Bank A/c - Cash Payment
PDA (Treasury) - Bank A/c- Cash Payment

3. The present system of pension imbursement is an opaque one in the sense that it does not easily provide details reg. no of pensioners, category wise distribution of pensioners, amount of pension disbursed in a month and govt's pension liability. Collation of the information from various sources is quite difficult and the output is not always accurate.

4. Further, in the existing system, there is a multiplicity of PDAs ‐ 29 Banks, 63 DPDOs and a large number (500+) of State Treasuries. As mentioned earlier, many a times PDAs tend to interpret Govt. Orders differently. This, in some PSA cases delays the implementation of the order itself and in some other cases the order gets to be implemented differently by different PDAs. In both cases, generally, pensioner is the sufferer. There are other issues/difficulties in the existing pension disbursement system:‐

I. With multiple PDAs, the system is not amendable to effective monitoring as well as grievance handling. It makes the task of all decision makers including the Ministry, a very difficult one.

II. There is a delay in booking the pension amount to Govt. account. This also makes it relatively difficult to know the exact pension liability.

III. Even at a given time, it becomes an arduous task to exactly find out the number of active defence pensioners (including categories‐wise) as the information is to be collated from a large no. of PDAs.

IV. Maximum pensioners are drawing pension from banks. It has been experienced that they (Banks) do not have dedicated staff to deal with pensioners' issues. Also, they are not well conversant with orders/issues peculiar to Defence pension.

The Proposed System

5. The proposed system of Centralised disbursement of pension is not only transparent but easy for information processing and retrieval (PPO & pension (Pension amt) documents).

PSA - CPDA - Pensioners - Bank A/c

6. Under the proposed system, after sanctioning pension and issuing Pension Payment Order (PPO), the pension sanctioning authority will forward the PPO and other details – including bank details – of the pensioner to the Centralised PDA (CPDA) on soft format through a secured channel. It could be on the CGDA intranet and for enhanced security could also be with digital signature. The CPDA will process the papers and will initiate first payment as well as subsequent monthly pension payments for credit to the pensioners’ bank accounts (as given by the PSA along with the PPO) through the NEFT/RTGS or the CMP (on‐line payment mechanism with SBI). Since the CPDA is making payment of pension – he can directly book the amount to the government account, avoiding any delay or suspense head booking. For the pensioners, there will be no change as they would receive pension in their bank account, as is the status presently. The proposed system only replaces the multitude of PDAs with a single PDA without affecting the pensioners’ interest and rather bringing about a focused delivery mechanism. There are a number of benefits of the proposed system –

i. Uniform interpretation and implementation of govt orders

ii. Instant booking of pension payment to govt accounts – giving authorities a true picture of the pension liability and payment.

iii. Better grievance monitoring system can be instituted with a single PDA. Easier for everybody.

iv. Centralised database will help in better exploitation of information and communication technology for the betterment of services to the pensioners.

v. There will be no change as far as pensioners are concerned. They will continue to receive their pension in their given bank accounts.

vi. No loss to the banks in terms of accounts maintenance as they will continue to be the final pension paying agency.

vii. Future scalability is possible and relatively simple. For example, a centralised call centre could provide solutions to the pensioners for their queries or complaints.

7. In addition to these benefits, the proposed system will also result into a large saving to the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Presently, MoD pays Rs. 60 per transaction to Banks; and with 12 regular payments and 4 DA payments in a year, MOD pays Rs 960 per pensioners per year. For 18.06 lakh Bank pensioners, this amounts to almost Rs. 180 Cr. every year. If all pensioners are brought under the centralised PDA system ‐ where CPDA will credit pension in pensioners Bank A/c through NEFT/RTGS ‐ saving of Rs. 180 Crore could be achieved.

Implementation Modalities

8. Phase I can cover all new pensioners – appx. 80,000 per year – coming into pension fold. This can be done from a particular date which can be decided after taking decision on centralised pension disbursement and creating necessary IT and Communication infrastructure.

9. In Phase II all DPDO pensioners can be covered. All original files may be shifted to the CPDA DPDO‐wise. Given that out of 63 DPDOs, 52 have been centralised under Project Ashraya (Pension disbursement system), this is likely to be smoother phase wherein shifting of files and their appropriate indexing will be the main activity / focus.

10. In Phase III existing bank pensioners can be covered depending upon the response of the banks. This would be the toughest phase both in terms of making banks agree to the new model and in database management Banks revenue loss will also be a big issue from their perspective. As such this phase will require perseverance
and a different strategy (including for database management) which can be derived and decided later from the success of the first two phases.

11. An issue which may require a conscious decision would be whether the centralised disbursement should be from one location or multi‐location. It is considered that in a networked environment, location may not be an important factor from the view‐point of users. However, for the ease and adaptability with the existing pension set‐up, it is recommended to have three centres associated with the existing pension sanctioning authorities, viz. PCDA (P), Allahabad, PCDA (N), Mumbai and JCDA (AF), New Delhi. It is also recommended to have a centralised call centre, which can have access to the complete database of the three centres of CPDA. The call centre can be colocated with one of the three centres for the purpose of administrative convenience.

Role of DPDOs in the proposed centralised system

12. DPDOs are Pension Disbursement Agencies (PDAs) in the exiting set‐up. Each DPDO is a distinct PDA. Presently, 63 DPDOs – 51 in northern India and 12 in Southern India (Eastern central and Western India have no DPDOs) – are working as PDAs for 4.7 lakh pensioners.

13. If we divide the role of a DPDO in terms of (i) processing of monthly pension payments and (ii) identification exercise (which is not restricted to any specific month (e.g. November for bank pensioners) and continues for the whole year) then it can be stated that in the proposed CPDA paradigm, role of DPDOs will not be there for first part (i.e. payment processing). However, they can be effectively used for the second part ‐ identification of pensioners. This would mean that DPDOs would need to be remodelled as service centres for pensioners/ which will carry out their annual identification, accept change requests/applications on behalf of CPDA (for cases related to re‐marriage, re-employment, death, Bank account changes etc.) and can also act as grievance handling /settlement centre as they would be linked with the CPDA server and can have a higher protocol communication with the CPDA call centre. It is considered that in the proposed model ‐ one DPDO may only require one AO, one AAO (or two AAOs) and one MTS ‐ all proficient on the new system. Savings achieved in manpower (to be assessed) can be used for opening up a few more service centres in areas where pensioner concentration is relatively very high or in existing offices of DAD or even with the Zila Sainik Board Offices.

Infrastructure requirements

14. To start the work at the CPDA, it is assessed that manpower strength of one IDAS, One AO, two AAOs, 4 Adrs and 2 MTS would be sufficient and can even last for the first two phases with 2‐4 additional Adrs. It is assessed that this manpower can be spared from the existing resources of the organization of CDA (PD). Hardware requirement would include the following:‐

Two Blade Servers of latest specification 8 PCs, 8 Printers including one line printer

2 10 KV UPS

LAN

Wan connectivity with 4 MBPS Bandwidth

15. Software requirements would include operating system, Application software, and Anti‐virus. While OS and anti‐virus can be bought off the shelf, Ashraya can be used as application software with modifications amenable to centralised processing as well as call centre type information retrieval. In the medium term, however, there will be an unavoidable requirement of a professionally designed & developed integrated system and action for the same would need to be taken.

16. Other office equipment will include furniture, phones (including highend communication system for call centre purposes), photo‐copiers, Genset etc.

17. Similar hardware requirements would be there for setting up the call centre. While call centre manpower can be outsourced, monitoring can be effected by the CPDA officers, as call centre is proposed to be established colocated with the CPDA.

Costing

18. It is estimated that total fixed cost for establishing the CPDA will be in the range of Rs. 80 – 100 lakh. This will include Computer Hardware, Office Equipment, Communication system, LAN and WAN connectivity (as detailed out above) and other Misc expenses as per following details –

Servers Rs. 35 lakh

Printers Rs. 4 lakh

PCs Rs. 4 lakh

UPS Rs. 4 lakh

Gen Set Rs. 3 lakh

Photocopier Rs. 3 lakh

Furniture Rs. 10 lakh

Communication Rs. 15 lakh

Misc. Rs. 2 lakh

Total Rs. 80 lakh

Thus, for the establishment of three disbursement centres and one call centre, total one‐time cost is estimated to be in the range of Rs. 3 – 4 crores.

19. Running Cost excluding manpower cost but including maintenance of all hardware, communication expenses and WAN connectivity rentals (and hired manpower for call centre) is estimated to be Rs. 25‐30 lakh per year per centre or Rs. 1 to 1.5 crore for the four centres.

20. Manpower cost has not been estimated because it has been considered that the immediate requirement can be met by drawing the required manpower either from the savings which may be achieved in the existing DPDOs or even from the ZO (PD) / CDA (PD). It is, however, estimated that cost will be involved – both for hardware as well as for manpower – if service centres are required to be opened at new locations. While the one‐time establishment cost is estimated to be in the range of Rs. 15 lakh, running cost (including manpower cost for 1 AO+1 AAO+2 MTS, rental charges and other maintenance charges) could be appx Rs. 40 lakh per annum per service centre. For opening of say 50 new service/liaison centres, a one‐time expenditure of Rs. 7.5 crore would be required whereas total running cost would be Rs. 20 crore per annum.

Issues

21.The following issues are expected to emerge in the new set‐up :‐

i. From the feedback received from various quarters, the biggest issue that is likely to emerge in the new set‐up would be the lack of an agency which could provide the pensioners a forum for personal interaction/contact at their nearest place. In the exiting set‐up, DPDOs and bank branches provide this and associated services to their respective pensioners. In the proposed set‐up, as discussed above, DPDOs can continue to play this role for all pensioners in their areas. However for bank pensioners (particularly in areas where DPDOs are not operating), this issue will need resolution as this will have a bearing on other associated issues like identification at the time of first payment, annual identification, change requests, intimation of re‐employment & re‐marriage, death cases & life time arrears payment etc. To address these issues, different models can be considered:‐

I. For first payment, in r/o PBORs, respective PAOs may be authorised to identify the pensioners on the next day of their retirement (since the PBORs are attached with their respective Record Offices till the last day of their retirement). The PAO may log into the CPDA system and do the needful. System would need to provide this facility and necessary rights for the same. Jeevan Praman website can also be an option for this purpose.

II. Officers may also approach Defence Pensioners Liaison Centre for this purpose. Jeevan Praman website can also be an option for this purpose. (Since, original document in the proposed set‐up are to be with CPDA, it is presumed that it may not be possible to assign this responsibility to the pensioners bank branch.) Similar process may be followed for annual identification also, for which even periodical camps may be organised at some of the locations. Further, for inquiries as well as grievance redressal, establishment of a centralised call centre, as discussed in preceding Para, would be a vital and unavoidable requirement. The call centre can also appropriately guide the pensioners about many of their issues and about course of action they need to take regarding any particular activity.

iii. Processing of 25 Lakh pension payments every month could be another challenging issue which would require robust infrastructure ‐ hardware, software, communication, and human ware.

22. It is perceived that this challenge is not insurmountable and could be overcome with a mix of planning, implementation and exploitation of Information & Communication Technologies and also adequate resources as discussed above.

Conclusion

23. The proposed system of Centralised Disbursement of Pension far outweighs the existing distributed system in terms of benefits to the Ministry, to the Pensioners and to the overall system per se. It is easier to implement, to monitor and to maintain. The system is positively susceptible to current grievance management and to future scalability. It would be possible for the Ministry to get information about total number of pensioners, category wise distribution, exact pension liability etc. from a single source. Finally, the system, if fully implemented, can result into a huge saving of Rs. 150 crore every year to the Ministry of Defence.

(SOURCE CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES BLOG)

9 comments:

  1. Dear sir,

    iT IS VERY GOOD EFFORT. If it comes through, in the real sense , we the Pensioners will be happy.

    Now adays, the banks people are making us to run pillar to post to get our correct pension. . Because they are not interested / aware of all the circulars and the Terms in the Defence structure like Rank, Group, QS etc.

    Delay in implementing the scheme or Revision of pension as per PPO and so on.

    If this CPDA comes in to operation,. Payment of first pension, revision, switching over to Family pension, Enhanced Rate , Ordinary rate , Special family pension, Liberalised Family pension , Disability , War injury pension - all these categories will be done by defence department and it will be ERROR free - if done in reality.

    But in the present days, even our DPDOs are functioning / doing the correct works, not responding to queries and still many pensions not revised and so on.

    System seems to good. Let us hope that the New Concept works well.
    there should be atleast 4 CPDA in our country - Delhi, Mumbai, Calcutta and Chennai covering the entire country.

    There should be Redress of Grievances cell also to report the non payment of pension correctly.

    .

    At present The PDAs are telling the pensioners to approach the CPPC for any discrepancy , in the same way , in the New system also the banks may tell to approach the CPDA for any discrepancy..

    Let us pray the New scheme if comes in to existance works well , by passing the Banks. The banks will have no part to play except operating accounts like Savins Bank.

    Thanking you, Sir.
    Sgt.S.Kanthiah
    Chief liaison Officer,
    Exwel Trust, Tirunelveli-dist,
    Tamil Nadu.





    ReplyDelete
  2. This paper and proposal would have been brought long back. System only starts working once there is Strong Headed Boss in the chair to pull up the subordinates for their lazy working hands and who are avoiding required info with one or other excuse. Very much thanks to present Defence Minister Mr. Manohar Parrikar.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Laudable efforts. My compliments to CGDA

    Major General (Retired)

    ReplyDelete
  4. The dpdos will eventually become obsolete as jeevan praman comes in to full force so is with bank cppcs.But effective strengthening of zsb s and call centre to attend pensioners greviences at pcdas is a must.start with new pensioners and dpdos.a great vision

    ReplyDelete
  5. The greatest charm of bureaucracy is to go round and round without any accountability and opening of new departments at the drop of a hat to create more delay and buck passing. These are times of privatization even in the Military as shown by Americans in Afghanistan where rear area security and logistics completely taken over by corporations. The Defence Account System has outlived its utilities in this era of modern accounting through advancement in computererisation. Privatization will ensure economy and fair play . SC has repeatedly levied heavy burdens on the Goernment for manipulations leading towards unfair deductions in pay and pension of servicemen . This must be discouraged through privatization to IT corporations so that dues are available at the door steps of veterans. Emulate the system of gas subsidy

    ReplyDelete
  6. The present system of disbursement through banks was adopted as the local Treasury were unable to deliver the goods besides the veterans were undue
    harassed by the civilian staff. Now reverting back to the original system indicating a saving of 150 crores, a peltry sum by present day standard, is not understood. The proposed system is like serving old wine in new bottle. The is a saying in Hindi " दाल मे कुछ काला है। " It is for the veteran organisations to figure out what is best for the veterans. I have serious apprehension about the proposal. It would be in our interest to make an effort to remove the problem being faced in the existing system than to revert back to a system which any way was much worst than the present one.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The proposal of new pension disbursement system proposed by CGDP has to be examined on the following points:-
    1.This can be a new tactics by the CGDA to establishing his domain in the pension distribution system where by he might be looking ahead of increase in staff strength including few IDAS officers
    2. The proposal need to examined throughly in consultation with IESM org & pensioners to understand and evaluate the problems being faced by pensioners with the existing system.
    3. Since the intoduction of CPPC in the banking system for payment of pension there are some problems & delays in making payment in the case of reversion of pension.The working out of arrears is many a times delayed and incorrectly worked out. The bank do not accept the complaints from pensioners nor they are willing to raise the issue with CPPC. When matter is referred to PCDA pension, they keep silent months together and fwd the pensioners complaint to concerned CPPC and wash their hands.Actually working out of pension arrears is function of PCDA (P) which they do not do and pass it on to PDAs.
    4.The present system of pension disbursement is on the basis of convenience of the pensioners because in India every where banking system is not available. Certain areas even govt treasuries are not there.So those areas are covered by DPDOs and Post offices. Therefore the pension has to distributed by multiple agencies.
    5. Working out of correct pension is the responsibility of the PCDA (P) and the same has to be cammunicated to PDAs for disbursment. Why this responsibility can not be carried out by PCDA(p) ?.They wanted to create one more office for this purpose which should be examined keeping in view of the pensioners advantages.
    6. Thus the propsal is not reliable on its face value and the reasons brought out in the proposal are also not trust worthy on the simple reason that the CGDA and his IDAS officers never remained helpful to Defence services and it's subjects. CGDA is an agency responsible to impliment Govt directions and policies but they have already emerged as policy makers and the Govt is simply a rubber stamp to approve their policies and direction's. Therefore some body in the IESM to examine the proposal and evaluate the pros and cons keeping view of the pensioners interest and render suitabe advices to A HQ and DM.
    The writer is of the opinion that PCDA (p) should organise a monitoring cell with in the office of the PCDA (P) as the entire information which CGDA wanted to collect from proposed CPDA is already available verbatim at the foot step of the PCDA (P).The need is to bring the desired info into a right format of the system management and it can be easily submitted to any agency when ever is called for.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Today , you hardly have any issues related to pension which is due to the Bank's (PDA/CPPC) nonperformance . almost 100% of the issues are related to the CDAs or Records faults.
    Let the CGDA properly supervise issue the Corr PPO of 6 CPC to all pensioners first (they could not issue a simple corr PPO for past 9 years !!,). Thank god , the banks have taken actions on executive orders and therefore the veterans are getting their pensions post 1/1/2006(CPC).
    God save the poor pensioners when these non-professional-nonperforming IDAS babus unilaterally decide on your monthly pension. If the proposed system gets implemented , there is a waitting catastrophy ,if it happens real.

    Such a computer based system , if at all is conceptualised , it should cater for all Central Government employees and defence pension system should be just a subsystem to the main system.

    Can any one smell the rat . The IDAS is trying a back door trick to enhance their cadre streangth and promotions. HOW CAN YOU TRUST A SYSTEM WHICH COULD NOT CORRECTLY WORK OUT THE FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT OF FUND NEEDED TO IMPLIMENT THE OROP ??? Give this work to a any GD clerk in a combat unit and he will work it out nearest to 5% error . This was just a 8th standard mathematics which the CGDA could not do. How do you expect them to manage a system so effectively managed by the Banks .

    ReplyDelete