Dear Sh R K Arora,
Refer public notification on ibid subject published under your signature on
13.04.2016 vide F.No.12(39)/2015/D(Pen/Pol)(Part-V), MoD,
Department of Ex-servicemen Welfare D(Pension/Policy).
I, Col Rohit Kumar, a Veteran, find the following lacunae in One Rank One
Pension published / announced by Government of India. Please forward my
observations to One Man Judicial Committee set up for redress.
The basic minimum that needs to be addressed immediately are:
1. Restore the pension of Jawans and JCOs to 70% of
last pay drawn as was the case prior to 1973.
2. Family pension of defence personnel to be the
same as the pensioner themselves would have drawn and not reduced to 60%.
3. All defence personnel to be provided second
career till the age of 60 years through an act of Parliament.
4. OROP be implemented as concept in perpetuity as
per the original definition given in the Govt Executive orders dated 26 Feb
2014 as under:-
(i) OROP as approved, implies that uniform pension
be paid to the Armed Forces personnel retiring in the same rank with the same
length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future
enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past
pensioners. This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the
current pensioners and the past pensioners, and also future enhancements in the
rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners.
(ii) It further implies that Pensions of past defence
retirees will be equal to that of a person with same rank and length of service
retiring wef 01 Apr 2014, future enhancement in the rates of pensions will be
automatically passed to the past pensioners.
5. Change in definition of OROP introduced by the
Government, “Equalisation on periodic Intervals”, has killed the very soul of
OROP must be cancelled immediately.
6. Pay, Pensions and all allowances of armed forces
combatant personnel to be fully tax exempt OR higher by at least 25% on “Year
Wise” basis vis-a-vis all other Govt Services and not rank / appointment based.
This is the very least the nation owes to men and women whose fundamental
rights as citizens were curtailed for the full length of their service.
7. Anomalies in 7th CPC Recommendations as
represented by the three Chiefs to the RM to be rectified on priority before
the acceptance of the 7th CPC award by the Govt.
8. OROP to be updated to 01.01.2016 and then the 7th
CPC applied to it.
Have a nice day
Regards Rohit
Sh R K Arora
Under Secretary/D(Pension/Policy)
Room No. 220A, B’ Wing
Sena Bhawan, New Delhi-110011
================================================
OROP
Implementation : Details to send letter - Col Rohit Kumar
मोटे मोटे
तौर पे
मेरे ख्याल
में ये
खामियां हैं
और आप
सब अपने
अपने हिसाब
से लिख
के अपने
अपने नाम
से अर्जी
जल्दी से
जल्दी भेज
दें
सारी अर्जियां
24 Apr 2016 तक पहुंचा
देंने की
कोशिश करें
अगर आप
डाक से
भेजें गे
तो पता
है
Under Secretary/D(Pension/Policy)
Room No. 220A, B’ Wing
Sena Bhawan, New Delhi-110011
अगर ईमेल
से भेजें
गे तो
आईडी है
us-pen-pol@desw.gov.in
मैं, (अपना रैंक
और नाम
लिखें), भुत पूर्व
सैनिक घोषित
One Rank One Pension में
यह खामिया
पाता हूँ
और इनको
जल्द से
जल्द और
पूर्ण रूप
से ख़तम
करने की
जरूरत समझता
हूँ
मेरी यह
अर्जी सरकार
द्वारा बनाई
One Man Judicial Committee को
सौंप दी
जाये
1. पेंशन के
रूप में
जवानों और
जेसीओ की
पेंशन आखरी
तनखा का
70% होना चाहिए
जैसा की
1973 में था
।
2. फौजियों की
फॅमिली पेंशन
जितनी पेंशनर
की पेंशन
थी उतनी
मिलनी चाहिए
न की
कट कर
60% जो आज
मिलती है
3. सभी सैनिकों
को 60 साल तक
दूसरी नौकरी
प्रदान करने
के लिए
संसद का
अधिनियम पास
होना चाहिए
4. OROP
पे सरकार
कार्यकारी आदेश
दिनाक 26 Feb 2014 के अनुसार
दिया जाना
चाहिए
एक रैंक
और सर्विस
के सैनिकों
में, चाहे
वोह किसी
भी सन
में पेंशन
आये हों,
पेंशन में
कोई अंतर
कभी भी
नहीं होना
चाहिए --- यह ही
एक परिभाषा
होनी चाहिए
OROP की ।
5. समय के
साथ पेंशन
अपने आप
बढ़नी चाहिए
ताकि कभी
भी किसी
पूर्व सैनिक
की पेंशन
उससे बाद
पेंशन आने
वाला से
कम न
हो बशर्ते
की दोनों
की सर्विस
और रैंक
बराबर हों
6. सरकार का
कहना की
समय समय
पर पेंशन
में वृद्धि
होगी तो
OROP की परिभाषा
का खून
करना होगा
और यह
कतेही नहीं
होना चाहिए
7. फौजियों को
बाकि सब
ही सरकारी
नौकरों से
कम से
कम 25% तनखा और
पेंशन (अलाउंस
भी) मिलनी
चाहिए आखिर
और कौन
देश के
लिए अपनी
जान की
कुर्बानी देने
के लिए
बध है
या हमें
इनकम टैक्स
से मुक्त
करना चाहिए
8. 7th
CPC की खामियां
जो की
तीनो सेना
के चीफ
ने रक्षा
मंत्री के
समक्ष रखी
हैं उन्हें
दूर करने
के बाद
ही सरकार
7th CPC की घोषणा
करे
9. OROP
को 01.01.2016 के हिसाब
से सही
कर के
फिर 7th CPC पूर्व सैनिकों
पे
लागू
करें
What is the purpose of writing such letters. Is the Colonel representing his case or dictating his demands?
ReplyDeleteThis seems more a dictating of a demand rather than any logic/ reasoning given for each of the requests submitted.
ReplyDeleteDear Sir, I have retired as Sub Maj with 17 years total length of service and my other colleagues in the same rank with 30 years total length service. But both of us have served 4 years as Sub Maj. But my pension is too less than my colleague. Therefore this anomaly is required to be removed.
ReplyDeleteThe pension table shall be prepared based on length of service in the last rank held.
Regards
Prakash Pattar
To whom you are pleading to correct your pension?
DeleteCol.Rohit Or somebody else?Is he part of anomaly rectification committee?Please write to the undersecretary pension.
Srinivasan Indian Navy rtd MCPO-I
Good morning sir, so far there was a difference in pensions of different length of service and trades , some got before in 15 years and out, i got in 18 years and out in 20 yrs , so far there was a difference in pensions but now equal, hence what is the use of serving more and because of different trade, he got promotion sooner, where as now a days every one joined together does not get promotion and that too not too fast like those days specially in JCOs ranks even after ACP / MACP , How this will be compensated among us where as officers get quicker promotions besides more differences in pay scales created, officers given more weightage than JCOs even, so much more difference created in pay scales / pensions, in facts jcos pension must start from starting scales of officers because of their experiences in services and must end equivalent to at least equivalent to colonel like in civil services JAY HIND
ReplyDelete40% Extra pay was given to Officers and JCO except other ranks in the Fifth Pay commission ie Civ UDC equal to Nb Sub started pay scale from 4000- and Nb Sub pay scale was started from 5600- 4000x40+4000=5600 and Sub pay scale was started from 6600- like Assstant.Why the other rank not given 40% extra from civ estimate.
ReplyDelete