Tuesday, April 5, 2016

GOVT AGAIN COMMITS TO COMPLY WITH CAT JUDGMENT FOR REVISION OF PENSION OF PRE-2006 PENSIONERS WITH LESS THAN 33 YEARS SERVICE BUT SEEKS MORE TIME FOR COMPLIANCE


Orders are likely to be issued early for full Pension to the Pre-2006 Pensioners who retired after 10 years of service on superannuation or 20 years of service on Voluntary retirement or on absorption in PSUs. Their pension shall be revised as per judgment of CAT New Delhi instead of Pro-Rata Pension.

Govt. advocate, while replying to the Contempt Petition filed by CGSAG (S-29) Pensioners Association-vs-UOI, had agreed in CAT New Delhi on 16-2-16, to implement within 4 weeks the CAT judgements (dated 21-4-2015 in OA 1165/2011 & Dated 22-1-2016 in OA 2165/2011, RA 165/2015 & 175/2015).

In the hearing of the Contempt Petition in the CAT on 31-3-2016, the Govt. Advocate sought more time to submit compliance orders on the judgment. The next date for hearing was fixed on 25th May, 2016.

Earlier, the Department of Expenditure, wanted to restrict the said benefit to the Petitioners, but finally agreed in a Meeting with Staff Side JCM on 10-3-2016, to reconsider the matter in view of the opinion of Deptt. of Legal Affairs for implementation of the CAT orders.

(Source- http://www.rscws.com/ )

6 comments:

  1. CAT and AFT .Some legal experts may apply their mind and analyse their differential powers in the judgements over the cases involving the
    affected.
    I ,have a feeling that cases by CAT are resolved with greater clarity ,faster and the CAT judgements are implemented faithfully ,where as judgements by AFT are not implemented?.
    Also ,cases are taken up much faster in CAT.
    This is a sort of comment to generate debate among bloggers and get enlightened.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. defence service in particular service in the Army is tufer than civil service.therefore honorable PM and RM are requested to extend this kind of benifit to defence personnel also on humanitatian grounds. Regards

    ReplyDelete
  4. What about those with service more than 15 years but less than 20 years and took voluntary retirement.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pl enlighten if d said verdict of CAT is applicable 2 pbors of d AFs ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sir I am really Astonished to the government discision. The government before coming in power in Haryana's Campaign announce OROP wef 1stApril 14.Now it has changed to July. Many Associations had gone to High COURT and AFT and at Last to supreme Court. The disision of all that is to pay the arrears wef1st April 14.But the same government after coming to power change it to July 14.But Iappreciate to Government Something has given to Exservimens.

    ReplyDelete