Tuesday, 23 December 2014 - 1:39pm IST |
Enraged with the delay in implementing the scheme, all ex-servicemen criticized the incumbent government’s 'double standards' towards the army men
Now employed as a security guard in a government bank, Harwinder Singh, retired from the armed forces in 2008. Sharing his predicament, Harwinder confesses that he does not want his children to serve the nation as army men. “I have been forced to take up a job after retirement to sustain my family because the pension that ex-servicemen receive is too less to manage our expenses. I will never let my children work in army until heavy reforms are introduced to improve the deplorable condition of jawans, who fight and sacrifice their lives for the nation.”
Echoing the concern of many ex-servicemen like Harwinder, members of National Ex- Servicemen Co-ordination Committee (an apex body of ex servicemen organization) gathered at Jantar Mantar on Monday demanding immediate implementation of 'One Rank One Pension' (OROP) scheme. Veterans, along with war widows, from all over India also joined the protest.
The scheme that demands equal pensions for retired soldiers of the same rank and length of service, regardless of when they retired was also a part of BJP's manifesto in the Lok Sabha elections held earlier this year. “Honourable PM Narendra Modi Jee raised a lot of concerns for the deplorable conditions of the retired servicemen. Six months have passed by since the BJP government has come to power after winning with a clear majority, however, nothing has changed on the ground,” mentioned one of the speakers of the committee.
Enraged with the delay in implementing the scheme, all ex-servicemen criticized the incumbent government’s 'double standards' towards the army men. Expressing his anguish Ramanand Yadav, who had travelled all the way to Delhi from Gorakhpur to be a part of the protest said, “We were hopeful that the new government will understand the plight of retired servicemen, but ever since they have come to power, they seem to have forgotten the sacrifices that we, as army men, made for the nation.”
Ramanad retired from the air force in 1998 as junior engineer and holds a diploma in technical education. “After retirement, I was being offered a job of security guard. Having served as a junior engineer, I could not take up that job. So, I decided to go back to my village and reside there. The soaring inflation does not allow us to do much with a pension of mere Rs 7,000.”
A cross section of speakers, during the rally, emphasized on the importance of the scheme that was commenced in the early eighties, when the rank wise pension of ex-servicemen were discontinued and their pension were clubbed with central government employees in 1973. At present, the army men who had retired before 2006 are compelled to live under meagre pension spanning across Rs 7,000 to Rs 9,000 .
Highlighting other instances of ‘discrimination’ within the army fraternity against the jawans, Venkatesh Narayan from Chandigarh, pointed out, “Once we are out of the army, we get a subsidy of Rs 3,500 while the officers get a subsidy of Rs 20,000, to make purchases from the army canteen. The huge gap says a lot about the position of jawans in the country.”
Talking about the long battle being waged by the National Ex-Servicemen Co-ordination Committee, Uma Shankar Sharma, General Secretary, shared , “ We have been demanding OROP since 1983 since the date of its inception. We presented this demand before the high level committee and a committee appointed by Government of India, Ministry of Defense, in 1990. The central government did not implement the scheme, although it had been recommended by Parliamentary Committee including Committee of Petitions headed by Shri Bhagat Singh Koshiary, Honorable MP Rajya Sabha on more than one occasion.”
Elaborating further, he said, “The organisation planned to return the gallantry awards to Honourable President of India, but relented following the advice of then Prime Minister of India. Political parties across party line have backed OROP both inside and outside the Parliament and have mentioned it in their manifestos.”
Approximately 32 lakh ex-servicemen are still waiting for the implementation of the welfare scheme. Although the incumbent government has already allotted Rs 1,000 crore for the scheme, it has failed to provide a roadmap to implement OROP.
Meanwhile, after the protest, the ex-servicemen submitted a memorandum with a charter of demands to the President of India , Prime Minister of India, Chairman Rajya Sabha and speaker Lok Sabha.
(Source-DNA News)
orop kab milega modiji ?
ReplyDeleteThese protests are a must to remind the Govt.of its promises.
ReplyDeletevery good step orop
ReplyDeletepromise of bring Black money and orop cant be fulfilled by Govt due to misleading by B
ReplyDeleteRespected Sir/Madam,
ReplyDeleteAmended fresh request for necessary amendment in OROP table for justice with Honorary Naib Subedar of Y Group is forwarded. This is for your information and further necessary favourable action please .
With reference the table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 February 2016.
I 2879637W Honorary Naib Subedar Vijai Kumar have served in Army 24 Years & 02 days. My service particular's is as under -
Date of enrolment - 30 October 1982.
Date of retirement - 31 October 2006 (A/N).
Date of birth - 25 April 1962.
PPO No - S/29763/2006 (ARMY)
Basic Pension as per 6 CPC - Rs 7750/-
Revised Basic Pension on acceptance of OROP - Rs 8425/-
It is observed that pension of X group Honorary Naib Subedar & Naib Subedar of 24 years service is equal i.e. Rs 11138/- as per table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 February 2016. But basic pension of Y group Honorary Naib Subedar & Naib Subedar of 24 years service is different. 24 years service of Naib Subedar basic pension is more than Honorary Naib Subedar of 24 years service & this diffrence between Honorary Naib Subedar& Naib Subedar of 24 years service is Rs 1004. In this circular in table No 7 Y group Honorary Naib Subedar basic pension is Rs 8425 & 24 years service of Naib Subedar basic pension is Rs 9424. It should be equal as OROP as implemented for X group 24 years service of Honorary Naib Subedar & 24 years service of Naib Subedar basic pension are equal.
Hony Rank of Naib Subedar granted to Havildar will be notionally considered as a promotion to the higher grade pay and will be allowed notionally for the purpose of fixation of pension only with effect 01 January 2006. The said decision has been communicated vide Ministry of Defence letter No. 1(8)/2008-D(Pay/Policy) dated 12 June 2009.
On the definition of OROP (Definition of One Rank One Pension - One Rank One Pension (OROP) implies that uniform pension be paid to the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners. This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners, and also future enhancements in the rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners.) and government of India Ministry of Defence letter No. 1(8)/2008-D(Pay/Policy) dated 12 June 2009 pension of Honorary Naib Subedar & Naib Subedar should be equal in the same length of service.
Keeping view of the above and as mentioned table No 7 of circular No 555 dated 04 February 2016 for 24 years service of X group Naib Subedar & Honorary Naib Subedar basic pension has fixed at same rate or equal, so Y group 24 service of Honorary Naib Subedar & Naib Subedar basic pension should also be fixed at same rate or equal. Please consider it.
Please do the needful for necessary amendment or issue related instructions for rectify the observations or variable? An early action is requested.
I shall be highly obliged.
Thanking you with warm regards,
Yours obediently soldier,
Honorary Naib Subedar Vijai Kumar
PPO No - S/29763/2006 (ARMY)
Mobile No 09871081782