The idea behind this blog is to educate/help/enlighten and not to create controversy or to incite. The opinions and views expressed on this blog are purely personal. Please be soft in your language, respect Copyrights and provide credits/links wherever possible.The blog team indemnifies itself of any legal issues that may arise out of any information/ views posted by anyone on the blog.
Educational qualification is not the only thing required to become an officer because if that was so why did a person join as an airman in the first instance. Why did he not go to the IMA/NDA like many others.To be suitabe to become an officer one needs other qualities also.
Every veteran knows fully well what qualities are essential to become an officer in any arm of the defence force.What are all the other extra qualities you, as an officer,have and the other ORs do not have,let your heart judge it.
This is not true. A matriculate after 10-15 years of service in the Army have a narrow chance to become sub/sub major. Where as within 15 years mostly get retired as sepoy or Nk at most. I am an under graduate, have completed 10.5 years IN EME discharged in the lowest rank (Cfn )despite fulfilled all required qualifications .see the fact.
You go to IMA/NDA to become officers, all IAF OR are serving in static formation and eight hour duty, they can pursue the academic qualification, even ration are issued on british scale. the only sufferer in the three services are army jawans who is committed to border to serve 24 into 7 for the sake of nation. I have seen so many IAF OR entered into army as officers, it is gross misinformation about army and its ethics, we, the army people are less academically qualified does not deserve remuneration at par with IAF OR, that what this SMS says, more over they take lion share in the civil employment after retirement, by taking the reservation meant for army also. there is no border commitment for IAF OR. do not circulate this type of circular degrading the service and honour of army people. retired army people life span is very less I retired in the year 1991 alongwith 15 army OR except two all are dead, thirteen army retiree met premature death
I talked about 'qualities' and not 'relatives'. Those who have relatives in higher ranks do not join the forces.There is an open competition, just and fair. Do not blame others if you do not qualify. People joining as officers come from very ordinary families and are selected on merit.
ANOMALY IN TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT IN APPENDIX ‘X’ OF PCDA CIR. 555 AND 501 IN APP.X FOR AIR FORCE IT IS MENTIONED THE TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT FOR HON. FLYING OFFICER IS 32 YRS.WHICH IS WRONG. IN AIR FORCE THE ELIGIBILITY FOR THIS RANK IS ONE YEAR BEFORE SUPERANNUATION THAT ALSO DEPEND ON SELECTION CRITERIA.SO THERE NO TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT LIKE ARMY/NAVY. BEFORE 05/1998 THAT TIME ELEGIBILITY FOR HONY.OFFICER WAS AT THE AGE 54 YRS. HAVING SERVICE OF 34 YRS. NOW AFTER 05/1998 ELIGIBILITY FOR HONY.OFFICER IS AT AGE 56 YRS. SERVICE 35 YRS. THE MAXIMUM TERM OF ENGAGEMENT IS MENTIONED 32 YRS. IN APPENDIXES OF ABOVE SAID CIRCULARS ,WHICH IS WRONG AND CAN NOT BE. IT SHOULD BE 33+ YRS. My pension is fixed after taking term of engagement 32 yrs. It is important to note that when a person was not holding pensionable Rank of HON. FLYING OFFICER ON OR BEFORE 32 yrs. of service because of promotion policy mentioned in Para 2 above, how his pension can be fixed at that term of engagement 32 YRS.At that time he must be holding junior rank from which stream he is is eligible for HFO rank. There is no term of engagement of Hony. Flt Lt/Hony.Fly. Officer instead there is a condition /eligibility mentioned in Para 2 above. How it sounds to a person when it happens to him. The promotion policy is not same for army, navy and air force.
Vk das, which kinds of talent you mention. The efficiency of an offer is entirely depends upon the obsolete British acts. What quality is there with an army officer. During bansilal regime, all graduates from haryana selected . how.
Educational qualification is not the only thing required to become an officer because if that was so why did a person join as an airman in the first instance. Why did he not go to the IMA/NDA like many others.To be suitabe to become an officer one needs other qualities also.
ReplyDeleteEvery veteran knows fully well what qualities are essential to become an officer in any arm of the defence force.What are all the other extra qualities you, as an officer,have and the other ORs do not have,let your heart judge it.
DeleteThis is not true. A matriculate after 10-15 years of service in the Army have a narrow chance to become sub/sub major. Where as within 15 years mostly get retired as sepoy or Nk at most. I am an under graduate, have completed 10.5 years IN EME discharged in the lowest rank (Cfn )despite fulfilled all required qualifications .see the fact.
ReplyDeleteYou go to IMA/NDA to become officers, all IAF OR are serving in static formation and eight hour duty, they can pursue the academic qualification, even ration are issued on british scale. the only sufferer in the three services are army jawans who is committed to border to serve 24 into 7 for the sake of nation. I have seen so many IAF OR entered into army as officers, it is gross misinformation about army and its ethics, we, the army people are less academically qualified does not deserve remuneration at par with IAF OR, that what this SMS says, more over they take lion share in the civil employment after retirement, by taking the reservation meant for army also. there is no border commitment for IAF OR. do not circulate this type of circular degrading the service and honour of army people. retired army people life span is very less I retired in the year 1991 alongwith 15 army OR except two all are dead, thirteen army retiree met premature death
ReplyDeleteYes vk das, those relatives should be in higher ranks or any other channels. Is this the quality u refer
ReplyDeleteI talked about 'qualities' and not 'relatives'. Those who have relatives in higher ranks do not join the forces.There is an open competition, just and fair. Do not blame others if you do not qualify. People joining as officers come from very ordinary families and are selected on merit.
DeleteANOMALY IN TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT IN APPENDIX ‘X’ OF PCDA CIR. 555 AND 501
ReplyDeleteIN APP.X FOR AIR FORCE IT IS MENTIONED THE TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT FOR HON. FLYING OFFICER IS 32 YRS.WHICH IS WRONG. IN AIR FORCE THE ELIGIBILITY FOR THIS RANK IS ONE YEAR BEFORE SUPERANNUATION THAT ALSO DEPEND ON SELECTION CRITERIA.SO THERE NO TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT LIKE ARMY/NAVY. BEFORE 05/1998 THAT TIME ELEGIBILITY FOR HONY.OFFICER WAS AT THE AGE 54 YRS. HAVING SERVICE OF 34 YRS. NOW AFTER 05/1998 ELIGIBILITY FOR HONY.OFFICER IS AT AGE 56 YRS. SERVICE 35 YRS. THE MAXIMUM TERM OF ENGAGEMENT IS MENTIONED 32 YRS. IN APPENDIXES OF ABOVE SAID CIRCULARS ,WHICH IS WRONG AND CAN NOT BE. IT SHOULD BE 33+ YRS.
My pension is fixed after taking term of engagement 32 yrs. It is important to note that when a person was not holding pensionable Rank of HON. FLYING OFFICER ON OR BEFORE 32 yrs. of service because of promotion policy mentioned in Para 2 above, how his pension can be fixed at that term of engagement 32 YRS.At that time he must be holding junior rank from which stream he is is eligible for HFO rank. There is no term of engagement of Hony. Flt Lt/Hony.Fly. Officer instead there is a condition /eligibility mentioned in Para 2 above.
How it sounds to a person when it happens to him.
The promotion policy is not same for army, navy and air force.
Where is my comment
ReplyDeleteVk das, which kinds of talent you mention. The efficiency of an offer is entirely depends upon the obsolete British acts. What quality is there with an army officer. During bansilal regime, all graduates from haryana selected . how.
ReplyDeleteArmy iaf Navy all are contributing in their role so everyone is important.
ReplyDelete