Monday, 9 January 2017
Defence
panel raises retirement age of soldiers by TWO years to 'cut new recruitment
cost'
Recommendations
of the Lt Gen Shekatkar Committee were submitted to defence minister Manohar
Parrikar
The
report also touches upon the creation of the post of Chief of Defence Staff
In
order to enhance their combat capabilities, a key defence ministry panel has
made several recommendations including increasing the retirement age of jawans
by two years, doing away with manpower in non-combat arms and shutting down
military farms.
The
recommendations of the Lt Gen Shekatkar Committee were submitted to defence
minister Manohar Parrikar almost three weeks ago.
The
report also touches upon the creation of the post of Chief of Defence Staff -
who would be the single point contact for the military with the government.
Army
jawans retire after serving a minimum of 17 years and depending upon their
promotion while in service, but they may get two more years of service
KEY PROPOSALS
·
The
Shekatkar panel recommended raise in the retirement age of jawans by two years
that will save the army significant amount on pensions and training.
·
The
committee also suggested optimising non-combat support arms in the army such as
supply corps, ordnance and engineers.
·
It
also recommended abolishment of military and dairy farms.
·
It
called for downsizing the remount veterinary corps which looks after horses and
mules.
·
It
suggested that only retiring personnel be sent to the NCC.
The
main aim of the committee was to suggest means to cut down on useless
expenditure and use the savings to acquire and enhance fighting capabilities of
the army.
One of
the most important recommendations of the committee was to increase the
retirement age of jawans by two years, which will help the army save a
significant amount on pensions and training of personnel.
Army
jawans retire after serving a minimum of 17 years and depending upon their
promotion while in service.
'If the recommendations are accepted, jawans and junior
commissioned officers till the rank of subedar major will get two more years of
service,' ministry sources told Mail Today.
'This will reduce the cost of training new jawans along with
the problem of providing them reemployment. Of the one million jawans in the
army, almost 60,000 retire every year.
'For two years, the forces can also save on recruiting new
manpower,' they said.
The Shekatkar committee has also suggested 'optimising'
non-combat support arms in the army such as supply corps, ordnance and
electrical and mechanical engineers who service cars and heavy vehicles.
'Even in remote areas of Arunachal Pradesh and Rajasthan, one
can get private agencies close to the border to service and repair army
vehicles,' the sources said.
Same applies for certain functions of the supply and ordnance
corps like supplying rations and clothes to the forces.
Their roles can be limited to during war and other critical
assignments.
The committee has also recommended abolishing military and
dairy farms, where several thousand army personnel and a considerable number of
officers are involved in mundane tasks like cattle rearing and growing
vegetables.
The committee has also called for downsizing the remount
veterinary corps, which looks after horses and mules for ceremonial as well as
operations in the higher Himalayan regions of J&K and Arunachal
Pradesh.
'With helicopters and road networks allowing vehicles to
reach the last points of border areas and mountains, there is no need to
maintain such a large force of mules,' the sources said.
The NCC is also on the radar of the Shekatkar committee as a
large number of officers from the Army are sent there.
'The committee feels that retiring personnel can be trained
and sent there as re-employment. This will save the army the regular personnel
for operational duties,' the sources said.
Source:- Daily Mail
Source:- Daily Mail
Well we all agree we need to cut cost... But at what cost to the lean mean fighting army. True.. farms can go. Some horses and mules can go..
ReplyDeleteBut engineers, ordinance and ASC... I fail to understand how. OK in peace time it's OK but what about hostilities and calamities where army is standing at all times.
Raising the retirement age goes against the basic young army profile...
God only knows how...
The wise Lt. General has seriously erred. In fact there is no need for army. We have lot of paramilitary who can be deployed in time of need.We can also follow our wise neighbour and raise mercenaries during times of need.The general appears to have taken stand after deep first hand in service study of about 35 years.He deserves an In chair Paramvir Chakra for his suggestions saving multiples of crores
ReplyDelete