Thursday, June 4, 2015

Raisina Hill Still Short-Changing India’s Soldiers : Why One Rank-One Pension is a non-negotiable right of our soldiers, and why any delay in its implementation is unacceptable. - By Jay Bhattacharjee

When the Narendra Modi government assumed office just a year ago, it generated hopes and aspirations among hundreds of millions of the country’s citizens. This was notwithstanding a few semi-academic exercises by some self-professed psephologists that labelled the electoral verdict as a minority vote. However, even among voters who were not supporters of the BJP-NDA combine, there was genuine goodwill for the new regime and expectations that it would deliver results, after ten years of appalling misgovernment and graft.
Among the groups that pinned their hopes most enthusiastically on the current occupants of Raisina Hill were the nation’s soldiers and defenders, retired and serving. This group of brave warriors, although not more than 7 to 8 million citizens in numbers, had been among the primary victims of seven decades of Nehruvian / Congress neglect and discrimination, and even outright perfidy, as many would say. The Prime Minister, in his earlier avatar as a candidate for the PM’s post, had made the most welcome gesture of addressing a large number of rallies of ex-servicemen, where he had categorically assured the brave warriors who had given their best years to defend their country, that their legitimate demands would be met by him and his party if they were voted to power. The oldest and most justifiable demand of the retired faujis was the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy. This had been hanging fire in the fiendish corridors of power in Delhi’s North Block and South Block and other assorted offices in the capitol’s Lutyens zone for decades. I will shortly come to the basic definition of OROP and its legitimacy.
When Modi first announced his public support for OROP in a rally in Haryana in September 2013, preponderantly attended by ex-servicemen, I enthusiastically applauded him. Thereafter, OROP was featured in the BJP’s election manifesto. After taking over as Prime Minister, Modi reiterated his and his government’s commitment to OROP a number of times.
However, the scenario at the operational level was quite different. The two nodal offices that are key to the implementation of OROP are the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Finance Ministry (MOF), not necessarily ranked in any order of priority. The three Services chiefs (Army, Navy and Air Force) are quite peripheral in the entire exercise. That is another story altogether.
For the benefit of the general reader, it would now be appropriate to define OROP, explain its history and analyse the reasons why it is such a genuine and legitimate demand of our soldiers and warriors. Shorn of all complexities and verbiage, OROP means that the same pension would be paid to armed forces personnel in the same rank who have retired at different times, after having put in the same years of service. In other words, a Naik or Subedar Major who has hung up his boots in 1998 (and is drawing a pittance of a pension) will be paid the same pension as their counterpart retiring today. Also, future increases in pensions will also be extended automatically to past pensioners. Naturally, this policy would also be equally applicable to officers of all ranks in the three services.
To explain this a bit further, so that the enormity of the crime being committed by the babus and the netas in Delhi becomes more apparent, it should be emphasised that an Indian soldier, airman or navy person retires at around the age of 37 approximately, while a civilian factotum (irrespective of his / her position in the pecking order) retires at 60. Officers, too, below the rank of Lt. General (and equivalent) retire much earlier than their babu peers. Therefore, the jawan and the middle-aged officer who left the forces 15 years ago, had to contend with enormous pressures to sustain their families and rear their children. And they still continue with the pittance of the pension they received. OROP merely makes up for the deficit of all these years, a deficit that was not merely financial but was equally a moral failure.
OROP has been exhaustively studied and researched for more than a decade. Around 12 years ago, in 2003, a Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence recommended it, and said most categorically that it was “a debt” the Indian Republic had to discharge, a debt that the Union Government must honour and pay. Eight years later, the Koshyari Committee was set up in March 2011 to study OROP in depth and make its recommendations. This Committee submitted its detailed report to Parliament in Dec 2011, unequivocally and robustly supporting the grant of OROP. It was hardly surprising that the UPA bunch of Manmohan Singh, Anthony, Chidambaran and the rest of the cabal sat on the matter and basically told the armed forces to take a running jump.
Therefore, Modi’s promises and assurances came as a breath of fresh air, even to cynical analysts like me and others in my group. However, the huge hopes built up during the election campaign and the change of guard in Raisina Hill a year ago, started withering and evaporating pretty quickly. Paraphrasing the 4th Earl of Chesterfield, we started wondering whether “there is always a degree of ridicule that attends a disappointment, though often very unjustly, if the expectation was reasonably grounded.” Even worse was the nagging doubt whether the new government was following Francis Bacon’s dictum that a government can “hold men’s hearts by hopes when it cannot by satisfaction”.
The first blow was struck by the new regime’s part-time Defence Minister Arun Jaitley a few months after the change of guard. A delegation of senior retired warriors who met the Raksha Mantri (RM), as the position is referred to in the terminology of Delhi’s babus, was stunned by the encounter. From all available accounts, Jaitley breezed into the scheduled meeting more than an hour late, made no effort to have eye contact with the visiting group and then moralised and hectored to them that they should reduce their expectations of what OROP entails, or words to that effect. The man’s stint as RM lasted a few months more and there is almost unanimous consent not just in the armed forces but in the country as a whole that the five odd months that Jaitley spent as RM were completely wasted.
Manohar Parrikar’s appointment as a full-time RM on the 9th November 2014 was widely welcomed. He came to the capital after building up an impeccable reputation as Goa’s Chief Minister. He had other things going for him as well – his simple, non-VIP style of functioning and his credentials as an IIT-trained engineer. The country’s fauji’s were cautiously optimistic, but after Jaitley, anybody else was an improvement. Even I was rooting for him, until Parrikar was struck by the deadly Delhi virus, a.k.a. the Raisina Hill syndrome. At a media interaction, Parrikar made a bizarre statement that only “80 per cent of OROP will be paid… because there is never 100 per cent in everything”.
Since then, the Modi government has been behaving as if it is participating in one of the tamasha performances in the Maharashtra of yore or the Bengali jatra shows that were once so popular in rural Bengal. Everything is a caricature, including the periodic homilies by the sutradhar, the off-stage commentator who explains the nuances of the play’s plot to the less-than clued-up audience. Periodic deadlines are announced or subtly hinted to the waiting media. The poor soldiers and warriors are treated like the proverbial serfs waiting to be fed crumbs from the tables of the masters. The piece-de resistance, sadly, has been two recent pronouncements by the PM and the RM after the 26th May (the first anniversary of the change of guard in the country) came and went.
Basically, the two worthies have now stated that the entire issue has still not been settled and there is no clear time-table for the implementation of OROP. The PM’s homily was the more disturbing of the two – he said that the definition of OROP was not clear. No, Mr. PM, this just won’t pass, simply because your stand is completely incorrect and factually wrong. OROP has been defined so clearly and categorically that any ordinary mortal, let alone someone of your abilities and stature, will never take this stand. I am afraid you are being disingenuous or the babus have taken you for a gigantic ride. I will be the happiest person on earth if my assessments spelt out here are proved wrong,
The Indian veteran is not somebody you treat as a doorman, Mr. Prime Minister. To say (quite correctly, I may add) that the Congress cabal did nothing for our veterans for many decades does not absolve you and your cabinet. Your babus are trying their best to sell you the lemon that OROP is vague, unworkable etc. but do please rise above their level and call their bluff. Remember the words of Harry Truman, who after being one of the world’s most powerful figures, left for home in his own car when he retired as America’s President, refused all benefits from his country’s exchequer and used his own funds to post his letters : “A president either is constantly on top of events or, if he hesitates, events will soon be on top of him.”
The Indian jawan, who has done his best for our country, expects, nay demands, that you do your best for him now. You and your government should stop treating the veterans as if they are asking for hand-outs, when all they are doing is demanding their dues that they were promised. Indeed, you and your administration should realise that there would be nothing for you to hand out if these intrepid warriors had not sacrificed their lives and limbs. Let me end by reminding you, Prime Minister, of Chanakya’s adage on the Emperor’s duties towards his soldiers. For a man of your erudition and knowledge of Indian history, I surely do not have to provide you the exact words.
But for your babus educated in various institutions that set great store by Western thought, let me remind them of the English saying about adoring God and the soldier in times of war and danger. The good poet goes on to add that “when the danger is passed and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted”.
Surely, the BJP-NDA government would not like to be remembered in the annals of history for having committed this cardinal sin.
Jay Bhattacharjee is a policy and corporate affairs analyst based in Delhi.
(Source- SWARAJYA MAGAZINE)  ==============================================================  COMMENTS
  • Thanks a lot to Mr Jay sir, for taking up the side/cause of the poor/neglected and slighted jawan in this country. Perhaps, NaMo is right in quoting, to have born in this country is a curse (earlier) ? But now also?
    The ex-soldier had been treated as a 2nd class citizen. After having served the country in prime youth (best part of his earning capacity), he is thrown out citing laws/rules (citing the forces youth profile). Does this happen in any family? Does this happen in any company/organisation? No. When soldier becomes dis-abled due to service exigencies, the doctors conduct med exams and declare mathematical 20% or more or less 20% disability status and board him out. Why? Cant he do any other suitable in the Forces or the Defence PSUs? (41 Ord Factories and scores of other Def Org).
    In civil they can appoint disabled and untrained youngsters, why notautomatically absorb the disabled veterans. For this Disability Act does not apply to Armed Forces. When all other laws apply to AF personnel, this is exempted.
    The less said the better about reservations to ESM. Strange and devious are the brains of these babus. Priority a},b),c) is for the for dependents of those killed, war wounded, disabled etc and the lastly the ESM. This is applicable not only in allocation of petrol/diesel/outlets etc. even in admission. The very definition of ESM has probelms. So many categories. With pension, without pension, SSC etc.etc. Only recently the Govt issued a notification.
    Virtually, the esm is treated with contempt in the forces offices like the Zilla Sainik Welfare Offices, CSD Canteens, ECHS, Mil hospitals. Then the scenario in Civil offices, Revenue/Police/other depts is worst. When your own house is not in order, how can you change the outside world?
    But despite all these odds, the jawans lead the life clinging to the nitty-gritty taught to them in Military service, without much of complaints. That is - Bash on, regardless.
    Thank you sir, thanks again.
      • Avatar
        I think by far the best and direct write up .No-nonsense with sugar coating politically correct statements as done by most commentators . My sincere thanks to Mr Jay. May your tribe increase , Our country needs direct speaking people
          • Avatar
            The apprehension of the govt. on the financial implications of OROP is not ill conceived. as noted by the RM there should be a give and take in any negotiation. 
            the argument of the soldiers that they will retire at the prime age after doing the most difficult job is to be appretiated by the high and mighty in the govt. like wise the financial burden OROP imposes on the govt has to be taken into consideration by the soldiers. The ideal solution would be to pay OROP until the soldier reaches the age of 65, which is more than retirement age of civil servants.Freeze the basic pay at that level and pay the pension for the balance of period as being done now.
            This will certainly give the pensioners a higher protection of pay for more than 20 years and the financial burden on the govt will reduce.
              • Avatar
                also ask the soldier to use only his right arm when defending the country, or to close his eyes while shooting.
                The soldiers' job is not just the most difficult, it requires absolute commitment, namely, and let me spell it out for you, his L I F E. He EXPECTS from government - that he is ready to give his life for - the same commitment to his family and his later years. If you reduce it to money, then don't expect the soldier to commit his life, and don't send him to war, to fight floods, earthquakes and all types of disasters, both natural and man made. Send the finance ministry babu instead, and ask them to commit their lives to the country. You will then find out who should be paid and who should not.
                  • Avatar
                    the main argument put forward for OROP is retirement of an soldier at an early age and his sustenance thereafter.considering the hardship they face during in service and after retirement an amicable solution has to be found. A middle ground has to be arrived at, which is a win win situation for both the soldier and the govt.
                      • Avatar
                        I recommend you check out all the armies of the world, and see if their pensions stagnate the way the babudom wants it to do. For example, check out to see the US pension growth and period of payment. You expect the soldier to commit his life without any clause attached, so please pay him for the remainder of his life, with no statutes of limitations and Terms & Conditions thrown in.
                      • Avatar
                        svpban.. when you retire at young age 37 /52 what do you do??? There are no assured jobs as is for IAS/IPS. Two have you heard of NFU . Even a deputy secretary can get Secretary's pay . India is the only country in the world which officially rewards incompetence. I will take you to any hill on our Northern Borders . I am 70 i will accompany you . Just climb it once to know what we are talking about. They reduced army mans pension from 70 t0 50% . Are you aware of it and increased the pension of civilians from 30 to 50% without batting an eyelid. Financial implication is the biggest fraud. Look at trips made by Mrs Patil or for that matter by karnataka Governer or the scams. Only exception was Mr Kalam . I am quoting only fringe cases. OROP is on back burner from 1973.... and what did the bureaucrats/politicians do reduced our pension and increased own...


                    1. Sir.

                      Last time you wrote in a leading daily regarding orop may be in Dec 2014 and me poor mortal thought that write up will opwn the eyes of polity.No they are still a subject of Babudom the kingdom of beureaucrats. As said Modi is taken for a Gignatic ride. Is it not correct that modi occupies the chair of PM owing to thease soldiers who fought to keep India intact.

                      Thomas Manimala.

                    2. Tks Bhattaji. It is well known fact that our demand is genuine one. Purposely if they deny we are not going to keep quiet further. Just let me know if a civil babu get a 5 rupees less in their salary would they keep quiet? Take a case of a lowest rank i.e. sepoy of 15 years service rendered getting Rs. 8000 less over so many years. you say still we have to have patience or what. Whether our demand is right or wron tell me. First of all, once BJP cannot calculate 8300 crore budget how about other budgets. If they are incapable resign and go.Why are they wasting time another 4 years in seat? quit the government.

                    3. It appears that this govt is direction less as regards defence and it's veteran why do they now think of a pension for veterans as is for MPS. What is the similarities between an MP and a soldier. This is utter nonsense. If the Govt feel that soldiers are a burden for the country they must disband it and utilise the services of MPS and MLAS for defense of the country. The Govt can save lot of money and the politicians can loot it the way they feel like. In case of war the Govt can outsource the defence forces from any other countries they feel like. Then the Govt need not have to spend money on pension for veterans. Please think it over again and again. The honourable PM may like this idea because he has developed lot foreign Govt contact and are goody goody with them. JAI HIND.

                    4. Sir, I would like to covey my best regard and thanks for your keen interests. I don't know what government has doubt now even after verdict of Supreme Court. They should state way remove the disparity between previous retiree and their counterparts retired today as per the guidelines. There should be one pension as per rank and length of service. I think government has no intention to implement this because they don't have realisation power regarding hard life of defence personnel specially PBOR they interested to take benefit of vote only. They don't have any valuation of their sacrifice.- Ravi Shanker Singh

                    5. where is my comment please? Publish it. Tks for 72 years old dada EME from bengal appreciation to me .

                    6. To all my brother veterans (that include elder as well as younger to me ) let us get united rather we are all already united and prepared not to allow to sleep bureaucratic jokers and politicians. for everything there is a limit. we are not asking from their pockets . You can fund for wi-fi,mianmar what not what not about 22,427 crores to donate you have but you don;t have 8300 for scarified veterans. Let us see you or we?

                    7. I would like to go with what svpban articulated. This is a mid way arrangement which the ESM fraternity should consider as OROP beyond 65 yrs of age will incur considerable financial burden on Govt and not feasible to sustain the regularly equated pension till the demise of ESM. Re-structure the OROP formula to benifit ESM and our country.