Friday, July 8, 2016

The 'blind leading the blind' was the order of the dayThe three wings of our armed forces continue to function as attached offices of the ministry. By definition and existing business rules, they have no role to play in decision-making at the MoD : Time for Manohar Parrikar to implement reforms in Ministry of Defence : By Suresh Bangara

Having addressed a series of long-pending issues of modernisation and 'Make in India' initiatives, Union Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar can now seriously get down to the most critical reform related to professionalising the structures of the Ministry of Defence. In the recent past, some path-breaking initiatives have come to light. Some of these are worthy of note. The defence procurement policy document has been almost completed and most of it has been placed in the public domain. The transparency of public policy is fundamental to the success of his contribution to the nation.
In a reasonably short period, 24 items of various categories have been awarded for indigenous design and development by the private sector. Checks and balances for completion of time-bound projects along with necessary incentives have been stipulated. This includes missile targets, smooth-bore gun barrels for tanks, diesel propulsion plants and many other systems including the manufacture of 100 new mobile artillery guns to L&T.
The selection of strategic partners from the private sector for long term partnerships has progressed with private sector experts leading the study group. Such a study was unimaginable in the old structures of the Ministry. Suspicion and excessive secrecy were tools used to wrap all such discussions in a packet called security considerations and national interest. The 'blind leading the blind' was the order of the day.
Sceptics, as always, question innovative and path-breaking processes but to take bold decisions and free us from the shackles of the pre-reforms era, is by itself a strong message to all. The Ministry of Defence has for too long been led by pusillanimous ministers with little or no inclination to expedite the process of decision-making. They were ably supported by bureaucrats, who were in many cases in transit to greener pastures.
The three wings of our armed forces continue to function as attached offices of the ministry. By definition and existing business rules, they have no role to play in decision-making at the MoD.
In the backdrop of the above, two recent decisions taken by the leadership have raised eyebrows. The first was the outright purchase of a reduced number of Rafale fighters and the second was the push for the acceptance of LCA Tejas, the Indian fighter — much delayed, but which attracted sufficient eye balls at the Bahrain air show.
Given the depleting force-levels of the Indian Air Force, the option to arrest the decline can only be through an expeditious induction route, while simultaneously pursuing the medium and long-term induction strategy.
Under the earlier dispensation, this was done in the case of the Indian Navy to buttress the decline of force-levels, by placing orders with Russia for the Talwar Class Frigates and Italy for fleet tankers. Except that in the case of Rafale, the heads of governments jointly arrived at a decision with no middlemen to siphon off commissions. It could not have happened without the concurrence of the Air Force and the resolve not to vacillate or equivocate. That is a big change in the style of leadership. The consultative process was matched by the ability to take decisions in national interest.
Next is the decision to sell the Brahmos missile to Vietnam.
The strategic dimension of this decision is considerable in the geopolitical context and the Chinese intransigence in matters of concern to India. Becoming a member of MTCR clears the deck for sale to other Southeast Asian nations that wish to strengthen their maritime capabilities.
The above must be seen in the context of Exercise Malabar with Japanese participation, concluding agreements with Iran on Chabahar and soft power measures brought to bear in West Asia and Afghanistan. Reforms in the decision-making process and directions given to the armed forces cannot be led either by the armed Forces or the bureaucracy. All such attempts in western democracies have been led by the political leadership.
Why then did we vacillate in 2002, when the Group Of Ministers strongly recommended wide-ranging changes in the manner in which the MoD functioned? It was because there was insufficient domain knowledge on matters concerning national defence, both in the bureaucracy and among the leadership, save a few.
As a witness to the whole process, it can be said with certainty that two eminent personalities played a vital role in arriving at the recommendations of the committee of defence management: Arun Singh, arguably the most knowledgeable technocrat on matters military and Jaswant Singh, a former soldier whose scholarly pursuits on India's security are quite unmatched to this day. Such was the mastery over the subject of reforming the structure of the MoD that it is fair to say that both the military and the bureaucracy were unable to match wits with them.
With the departure of these worthies, the process was dismantled by short-sighted senior military leaders who were too busy guarding their turf and a very relieved bureaucracy that had no stakes at all in reforming the structure.
That Parrikar, who has been at the helm of affairs, has revived the process to reform, has currently been a subject relegated to foot notes. One reason for underplaying his resolve may well be the creation of additional sub-committees. They are seen as mere delaying tactics to avoid taking a difficult but necessary decision. If Parrikar were to consult Arun Singh, perhaps he would be wiser in his attempts to push for the much-needed reforms and to avoid potholes on the path to ruthlessly implementing them.
Remember, reforms for MoD is what GST is to GDP.

The author is a retired vice-admiral of the Indian Navy and former chief, Southern Naval Command. Views expressed are personal

(Source- F.Business)

8 comments:

  1. If only Modi wants an effective Armed Forces a former soldier of scholarly status must be nominated to Rajya Sabha and make him the RM, then alone we will be able to gain the former glory and win future wars if any in our way. Failing which, all is lost never to regain once for all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fantastic idea.General VK Singh is also a minister if not RM.One does not need to have scholarly status to do something good.He should have basically the inner urge

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. General VK Singh even in service life too exhibited his selfishness in trying to extend his tenure and after retirement, he never even exhibited his solidarity with the veteran's demand for a fair deal, the OROP. There are many senior officers with a bent of mind to improve the service 's professional standards, they might have lost their rat race while in service, but are valuable assets to the nation. They must be made a RM with a vision and not mere politician who never know the soldiering which is a life long quest. The political will of the PM to have the best Armed Forces for the Nation is the immediate requirement at this juncture when the age old organisation is beginning to crumble to shambles.

      Delete
  3. Why cannot retiring Army General appointed Raksha Mantry (Defence Minister) for 2 to 3 years on retirement compulsarily or till next COAS retires and he should not belong to any Political Party. This appointment can be secured by amending Constitution to avoid any future difficulties. In case any DM ex-COAS is not proving succesful, he should be removed by 2/3 majority votes in both Houses of Parliament.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unless the proper representation and active involvement of armed forces personnel in MOD for policy decision and it's implantation, nothing would be in order for the defence forces
    Policies made by MOD are arbitrarily and deliberately violated by b,crats .orop is a burning example.
    MOD made a policy in 1994 for reservation in admission for defence children vide MOD letter no 3547(AS)/R/94dated 03 Jun 1994 which is still not implemented .This letter provide for reservation to defence children in 7 categories in admission in all the central/ state universities / autonomous institutes including IITs/ IIMS/ AIIMS but till date IITs do not provide reservation in all the 7 categories.It provides reservation to only first 4 categories in which hardly there is any claimant so the seats are transferred to general pool.last 2 categories include children of ex-serviceman and serving personnel who are always denied the benefit despite guidelines issued by HRD ministry and UGC vide link 0573724_letterscppll.pdf
    It is quite disheartening IIMs do not provide any reservation to defence children at all.It arbitrarily violates all the guidelines issued by HRD Ministry and treats defence children as second class citizens.Many a time the defence personnel approach court of law and claim reservation to their children but quite a few can afford to do so
    Certainly if uniformed personnel or the esm are a part of policy planning in MOD , defence personnel/esm will get their dues/ benefit on time .There would be timely follow up of policy implementation and many anomalies would be put to rest

    ReplyDelete
  5. Unless the proper representation and active involvement of armed forces personnel in MOD for policy decision and it's implantation, nothing would be in order for the defence forces
    Policies made by MOD are arbitrarily and deliberately violated by b,crats .orop is a burning example.
    MOD made a policy in 1994 for reservation in admission for defence children vide MOD letter no 3547(AS)/R/94dated 03 Jun 1994 which is still not implemented .This letter provide for reservation to defence children in 7 categories in admission in all the central/ state universities / autonomous institutes including IITs/ IIMS/ AIIMS but till date IITs do not provide reservation in all the 7 categories.It provides reservation to only first 4 categories in which hardly there is any claimant so the seats are transferred to general pool.last 2 categories include children of ex-serviceman and serving personnel who are always denied the benefit despite guidelines issued by HRD ministry and UGC vide link 0573724_letterscppll.pdf
    It is quite disheartening IIMs do not provide any reservation to defence children at all.It arbitrarily violates all the guidelines issued by HRD Ministry and treats defence children as second class citizens.Many a time the defence personnel approach court of law and claim reservation to their children but quite a few can afford to do so
    Certainly if uniformed personnel or the esm are a part of policy planning in MOD , defence personnel/esm will get their dues/ benefit on time .There would be timely follow up of policy implementation and many anomalies would be put to rest

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unless the proper representation and active involvement of armed forces personnel in MOD for policy decision and it's implantation, nothing would be in order for the defence forces
    Policies made by MOD are arbitrarily and deliberately violated by b,crats .orop is a burning example.
    MOD made a policy in 1994 for reservation in admission for defence children vide MOD letter no 3547(AS)/R/94dated 03 Jun 1994 which is still not implemented .This letter provide for reservation to defence children in 7 categories in admission in all the central/ state universities / autonomous institutes including IITs/ IIMS/ AIIMS but till date IITs do not provide reservation in all the 7 categories.It provides reservation to only first 4 categories in which hardly there is any claimant so the seats are transferred to general pool.last 2 categories include children of ex-serviceman and serving personnel who are always denied the benefit despite guidelines issued by HRD ministry and UGC vide link 0573724_letterscppll.pdf
    It is quite disheartening IIMs do not provide any reservation to defence children at all.It arbitrarily violates all the guidelines issued by HRD Ministry and treats defence children as second class citizens.Many a time the defence personnel approach court of law and claim reservation to their children but quite a few can afford to do so
    Certainly if uniformed personnel or the esm are a part of policy planning in MOD , defence personnel/esm will get their dues/ benefit on time .There would be timely follow up of policy implementation and many anomalies would be put to rest

    ReplyDelete