Monday, September 5, 2016

REPOSTED August 2, 2016 BLOGPOST : Chiefs of Staff Committee (COSC) Not To Implement the 7TH CPC for the Defence Forces till the time issue of Allowances, DACP for PBORs and NFU for officers etc are decided and implementation orders are issued by the MoD.



Forwarded as received -


The triservices pay commission cell, TRIPAS have advised Chiefs of Staff Committee COSC not to implement the 7 CPC for the defence forces till the time issue of of allowances, DACP for PBORs and NFU for officers etc are decidedand implementation orders are issued by the MoD. 

Though there may be delay in implementation of 7CPC, it would be helpful in the long run. In case 7CPC is implemented without finalising the just demands of the services, there are higher probability that none of the demands of services will be implemented. Service personnel will be made to run from pillar to post even for trivial issues like good conduct badge allowance, ration allowance etc. 

TRIPAS has recommended that 7CPC for pensioners may be implemented as and when Army instructions are issued.

The TRIPAS has also recommended that COSC to get a guarantee from the PM that several of non monetary recommendation that are made to improve overall efficiency of the central government and improving defence personnel's opportunity to get secondment or absorption in other organizations shall also be implemented in next six months.

It is learnt that COSC has accepted the recommendation of TRIPAS and has conveyed to the government that 7CPC shall not be implemented till issues are resolved. COSC have also apprised the government of seriousness of these issues.

(SOURCE- VIA E-MAIL FROM LT COL  BB GHAI, (RETD)

26 comments:

  1. This is the better way than merely accepting the 7 cpc as it is now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looks like after long time our chiefs have learnt to look direct into the eyes.
    No problem if we do not get pennies .. or the dollar is delayed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They could have started asserting long back.Systamatic downgrading of defence forces should be unacceptable.While the defence forces ask no questions to the political bosses being apolitical and loyal to the leadership, the pinch must be conveyed immediately in most polite,dignified but assertvie way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. They could have started asserting long back.Systamatic downgrading of defence forces should be unacceptable.While the defence forces ask no questions to the political bosses being apolitical and loyal to the leadership, the pinch must be conveyed immediately in most polite,dignified but assertvie way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes right way going on track
    Eyes opened

    ReplyDelete
  6. A good but mere just step taken by cosc to convey the demotivated and distress mood of armed forces.we got to demand and time to plead does not exist anymore. Our support is with you

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the political+bureaucracy doesn't blinks so shouldn't we. A fauji has minimal requirements we will live with it but no more degradation let the whole nation know about this. All faujis must take part in voting forces must shun proxy voting and plan leave of personnels educate troops about pol parties let politicians come to the cantonments for canvassing then only will the worth of defence forces shall be realised.Being apolitical has resulted in dribblling.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think right decision has been taken.OK.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Our country needs to progress the way a successful democracy with its military and para military forces do and at par with the group A officers...put no dividing lines as its like both sides of the same coin for our elite governance and leadership!

    ReplyDelete
  10. The steps taken now are in the right direction, even though it should have come fifty years back.Any way, it's better late than never.Congratulations to the present leadership.

    ReplyDelete
  11. fight it out we are always the winner
    dont compromise with suggested by TRIPAS
    look for future and better service conditions also

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think this is an old post, the gazette notification has now been issued without any modifications or accepted demand.The long wait for justice is going to continue .No one cares what the TRIPas cell have suggested,merely any demand met by 7cpc.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As understood, 7 CPC on issue of AI- yes. Tangibles as said-like DAPC, MSP, NFU etc

    Intangibles in terms of published government guarantee in terms of protocol and equivalence of soldier in terms of entrepreneurship. Soldier is one who goes out thinking of family and works for the nation

    ReplyDelete
  14. Perfect advice by TRIPAS. We as a fraternity must contest Govt's indiferrence, procratination & doublespeak by the PM, PMO, his cabinet & his bureau of myopic advisors, to remedy this longstanding ill meted out to the Indian Armed Forces.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Agreed.We would rather wait.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Way to go, but it is essential, as well, that pressure is simultaneously exerted on the Govt to expeditiously resolve outstanding issues. While the serving soldiers may be able to endure the delay, the pension of our old veterans needs to be disbursed as per the fitment formula based on last pension as early as possible, till a final settlement is reached.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dear sir,
    Again misleading info for PBOR's for DACP demand . What is in this DACP? For PBOR's nothing except NFU and other issues only for officers. COSC do not have guts to refuse the govt decision if do so will be removed as Bishnu Bhagwat . Pbor's should not trust in such things .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. THERE IS NO SUCH TERM EXISTS IN ARMY AS PBOR...OK YOU SEEM LIKE A LALU TYPE POLITICIAN. I M SURE YOU ARE A ROGUE MAN AND NOT A SOLDIER. HAVE SOME FRESH AIR AND DONT DIVERT THE TOPIC.

      Delete
  18. MSP -- Sep to SubMaj and EQV ranks less than MNS (Non combatant ) . MNS neither a soldier nor deal with any weapon /battle field even though MSP is higher than combatants . This is the justice of COSC to the PBOR's . As an PBOR's do not trust the military / def officers leadership as a result many PBOR's Associations registered in the country. In the PBOR's association officer can not be member , official or guardian . Now PBOR's are raising their voice of concern directly to the President ,PM,DM ,def secy , Joint secy and all higher levels.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Which allowance is applicable to pensioner. AI will prepared after serving allowances halt at posn. Any time bound? FM told CG employees celebrate this diwali with double happiness. Soldiers and family??

    ReplyDelete
  20. But I doubt this really will have some impact. Finally the clever babus will put up some offer which suits few. Then the question "why the entire forces are denied their right dues in right time" will have to answer by the Top brasses of all three forces.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Andheri Nagari,Chowpat Raja------Kya kahawat hai
    Maannaa padega jaroor!

    ReplyDelete
  22. @B Singh...why are u talking as if you are a thhekedaar of everything.Every body cant be equal...and regarding these associations of less officer ranks i must say that it is nothing but self satisfaction. Why are you throwing this poison between officers and jawans....I request the moderators to teach something decent to these advocates please. No officer will ever write ill of jawans. Tell tjis B singh that fauz is still being run efficiently by officers and all ranks have great respect. Your respect has gone when you became a civilion and you have the cheek to call names to chiefs...shameful. And what have these MNS officers done to u? They never come here and talk nonsense about our brave jawans in public because they are much more gracious than loudmouth handfuls like u. Get some sense. Speed!

    ReplyDelete
  23. 11 Sep report in The Tribune Service Chiefs reject pay commission report till anomalies resolved. All commands of all 3 Service a have been informed to inform all ranks. Service Chiefs taking bold steps in interst of services.Need of hour is to strengthened their hands & not to indulge in uninformed & immature criticism.In any case can those criticising service chiefs get armed forces better deal? No they canot.Fundamental right to comment does not mean abusiveness. It only defeats the purpose .

    ReplyDelete
  24. 11 Sep The Tribune..Service Chiefs write to govt that pay commission award not acceptable till anomalies resolved.All commands asked to inform all ranks of 3 services. An appropriate step by service chiefs.Strengthen their hands instead of I'll informed immature criticism. Can those criticising get services a better deal? SO shed negativety.Fundamental right to speech is not right to cause abuse unless one is illeducated.

    ReplyDelete